Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;34(1):89–95. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00285-0

Table 2.

Comparison of SEV exhaled by the patient and SEV in the patient’s expiratory hose after the carbon filter

ACD-100 ACD-50 t ACD-100 ACD-50 t ANOVA Bonferroni
30 min 90 min p 60 min 120 min p p Post hoc
Sevoflurane exhaled by patient (%) 0.91 ± 0.17 0.91 ± 0.21 1.000 0.99 ± 0.16 0.78 ± 0.20 < 0.001 0.003 60 ×  120
Sevoflurane lost (%) 0.07 ± 0.07 0.19 ± 0.08 < 0.001 0.11 ± 0.08 0.16 ± 0.09 0.116 < 0.001

30 ×  60

30 × 120

60 × 120

SRI 95.29 ± 6.45 85.54 ± 11.15 0.001 93.42 ± 6.55 88.77 ± 12.26 0.135 0.003

30 ×  90

60 ×  90

P values of Student’s T-test for paired samples and ANOVA p values with Bonferroni post hoc correction. Bonferroni shows between which groups of minutes there are differences

SRI Sevoflurane reflection index