Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 3;9(4):298. doi: 10.3390/antiox9040298

Table 13.

Results of sensory analysis of enriched juice.

Sample Appearance Colour Odour Aroma Sweetness Aidity Astringency Mouthfeel
JF 8.12ed 8.52ab 8.01c 8.14ab 8.23a 7.98a 8.03a 8.26a
JFA 8.01f 8.23f 7.87e 7.96e 8.01c 7.93a 7.86de 7.98i
JFB 8.04f 8.28ef 7.93d 7.98de 8.12abc 7.95a 7.89cd 8.01h
JFC 8.08e 8.33def 7.98d 8.02dc 8.14abc 7.96a 7.91cb 8.15cb
JFD 8.11e 8.49ab 8.00c 8.09b 8.18ab 7.98a 7.96ab 8.17b
JFE 8.32a 8.55a 8.11a 8.03c 8.03bc 7.95a 7.87de 8.06fg
JFF 8.30a 8.54a 8.07b 8.09b 8.14abc 7.95a 7.92cb 8.10cde
JFG 8.25b 8.53b 8.06b 8.12ab 8.17ab 7.96a 7.98b 8.12cd
JFH 8.22b 8.52ab 8.02c 8.16ab 8.21a 7.97a 8.02a 8.16cb
JFI 8.11ed 8.38cde 8.07b 8.10b 8.05abc 7.94a 7.85e 8.04gh
JFL 8.13cd 8.42bcd 8.04b 8.12ab 8.13abc 7.96a 7.89cd 8.08ef
JFM 8.14c 8.46abcd 8.05b 8.13ab 8.16abc 7.98a 7.92cb 8.12de
JFN 8.12ed 8.52ab 8.00c 8.15a 8.20a 7.98a 7.98b 8.13bcd
Sign. ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **

Data represent means ± SD (standard deviation) (n = 3). Differences were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) completed with a multicomparison Tukey’s test. **p < 0.05. Means in the same column with different small letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). Sign: significant