Skip to main content
. 2020 May 8;12:1758835920917558. doi: 10.1177/1758835920917558

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of OS.

Analysis N Random-effect model
Fixed-effect model
Heterogeneity
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value I2 (%) Ph
Subgroup 1: Asian 5 0.630 (0.337–1.178) 0.148 0.936 (0.788–1.112) 0.453 87.1 0.000
Non-Asian 6 0.666 (0.431–0.846) 0.000 0.666 (0.534–0.831) 0.000 0 0.478
Subgroup 2: sample case < 100 5 0.455 (0.279–0.743) 0.002 0.455 (0.279–0.743) 0.002 0 0.774
Sample case ⩾ 100 6 0.681 (0.454–1.022) 0.064 0.865 (0.751–0.997) 0.045 84.9 0.000
Subgroup 3: Univariate analysis 6 0.590 (0.429–0.810) 0.001 0.629 (0.519–0.762) 0.000 53.2 0.058
Multivariate analysis 5 0.608 (0.317–1.165) 0.134 1.075 (0.888,1.302) 0.457 74.0 0.004
Subgroup 4: HGSC 2 0.586 (0.291–1.178) 0.133 0.683 (0.497–0.938) 0.019 46.2 0.356
OSCC 2 0.479 (0.220–1.042) 0.063 0.486 (0.241–0.980) 0.044 17.3 0.271
LC 2 1.009 (0.502–2.028) 0.980 1.223 (0.996–1.501) 0.055 52.4 0.147
Others 5 0.542 (0.361,0.813) 0.003 0.582 (0.461–0.734) 0.000 58.0 0.023

CI, confidence interval; HGSC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer; HR, hazard ratio; LC, lung cancer; N, number of studies; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; Ph, p-value of Q test for heterogeneity.