Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;12:1758835920915302. doi: 10.1177/1758835920915302

Table 5.

Statistical analysis of protein expression for the selected antigens in the different cell lines.

Protein Cell comparison Significance p-value
TRIM28 All ns
NUCL All ns
VIM U87MG versus NCH * 0.0130
NCH versus astrocytes * 0.0263
U87MG versus U251 ** 0.0053
U87MG versus astrocytes *** 0.0002
NAP1L1 NCH versus U251MG *** 0.0004
NCH versus U87MG * 0.0286
NCH versus astrocytes *** 0.0009
TUFM All ns
DPYSL2 NCH versus U251MG **** <0.0001
NCH versus U87MG **** <0.0001
NCH versus astrocytes **** <0.0001
CRMP1 NCH versus U251MG ** 0.0015
NCH versus U87MG ** 0.0044
NCH versus astrocytes ** 0.0060
ALYREF NCH versus U251MG ** 0.0093
NCH versus U87MG * 0.0108
NCH versus astrocytes ** 0.0043

Significance of three samples was calculated using Student’s t-tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns, non-significant.

ALYREF, Aly/REF export factor; CRMP1, collapsin response mediator protein 1; DPYSL2, dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 2; NAP1L1, nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 1; NUCL, nucleolin; TRIM28, tripartite motif containing 28 protein; TUFM, mitochondrial translation elongation factor (EF-TU); VIM, vimentin.