Table 4.

Summary of results by construct

Dimensions	Constructions	Data synthesis
1. Characteristics of the intervention	1.1 Origin of the intervention	It positively influenced intervention in all sub-areas.
	1.2 Quality and Strength of Evidence	The intervention was designed on the basis of evidence and community preferences.
	1.3 Adaptability	For two sub-areas, the intervention met needs; for one sub-area, it did not.
	1.4 Complexity	The intervention was simple to implement.
2. External Context	2.1 Network	AGIR did not have networks of relationships in the area.
3. Internal Context	3.1. Structural characteristics	The implementing structures did not have a good internal organization.
	3.2 Networks and communications	Communication between the participants involved in implementation has worked well.
	3.3 Preparation of implementation	The climate varied between the beginning (negative) and end of the intervention (positive).
	3.4 Commitment of the leaders	The people in charge of AGIR were well involved in the implementation.
	3.5 Available resources	Resources were judged by some to be insufficient and by others to be sufficient.
4. Characteristics of individuals	4.1 Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention	The intervention was consistent with the beliefs and expectations of the participants.
	4.2 Self-efficacy	Intervention participants engaged in activities differently.
5. Process	5.1 Planification	Overall business planning was satisfactory
	5.2 Implication	Participants were involved at all stages of the intervention.
	5.3 Formally appointed internal leaders for implementation	The organizational mode resulted in the emergence of leaders within each team.
	5.4 Champions	The intervention was not able to generate new leaders.