Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2020 May 14;21:362. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6772-0

Table 2.

The genome completeness score assessed by BUSCO on all Ceratocystidaceae genomes

Species name	Code	BUSCO notation (%)				Complete SCG^a	Complete DG^b	Fragmented	Missing
Species name	Code	Completed	Duplicated	Fragmented	Missing	Complete SCG^a	Complete DG^b	Fragmented	Missing
C. albifundus	CALB1	97	7.5	1.5	1	1400	109	23	15
	CALB2	97	7.5	1.1	1.4	1401	108	16	21
	CALB4	97	7.8	1.3	1.2	1401	113	19	18
	CALB5	97	7.6	1.2	1.2	1402	110	18	18
	CALB6	97	11	1.2	1.2	1402	172	18	18
C. eucalypticola	CEUC	98	7.5	0.6	1	1413	108	10	15
C. fimbriata	CFIM1	97	7.4	0.7	1.4	1406	107	11	21
C. fimbriata	CFIM2	98	7.5	0.4	1	1416	109	7	15
C. harringtonii	CHAR	98	7.1	0.9	0.9	1410	103	14	14
C. manginecans	CMAN1	97	7.8	1.2	0.9	1407	113	18	13
	CMAN2	97	7.5	1	1	1408	109	15	15
	CMAN3	98	7	0.8	0.8	1414	101	12	12
C. platani	CPLA	98	7.9	0.8	1.1	1410	115	12	16
C. smalleyi	CSMA	98	12	0.9	0.7	1413	182	14	11
D. virescens	DVIR	98	6.5	0.9	0.4	1418	94	13	7
E. polonica	EPOL	98	6.7	0.6	0.9	1415	97	10	13
E. laricicola	ELAR	98	7.3	0.5	0.9	1417	105	8	13

^aThe number of Complete Single-Copy Genes

^bThe number of Complete Duplicated Genes