Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;2020:4181850. doi: 10.1155/2020/4181850

Table 1.

Study population characterization.

Parameter SPA group (n = 57) CTR group (n = 56) p value
Size or mean ± SD (%) or [mini-max] Size or mean ± SD (%) or [mini-max]
Patients' age at allocation 52.0 ± 7.2 51.9 ± 10.6 0.97
[36–66] [29–71]
Menopausal status Yes = 33 (58%) Yes = 35 (63%) 0.62
BMI—body mass index (kg/m2) 25.4 ± 4.6 25.5 ± 4.4 0.92
[18.4–35.9] [18.0–38.7]
≤25 kg/m2 30 (53%) 27 (48%) 0.37
BMI—class 25–30 kg/m2 16 (28%) 22 (39%)
>30 kg/m2 11 (19%) 7 (13%)
SF36—global score/100 55 9 ± 15.2 56.8 ± 14.0 0.30
[19.0–93.0] [29.0–95.0]
Surgery for breast cancer Yes = 57 (100%) Yes = 55 (98%) 0.50
Radiotherapy Yes = 54 (95%) Yes = 54 (96%) 0.98
Hormonotherapy Yes = 43 (75%) Yes = 43 (77%) 0.87
Herceptin Yes = 5 (9%) Yes = 7 (13%) 0.56
Chemotherapies: number of cycles 6.3 ± 1.1 6.0 ± 0.8 0.29
[5–15] [3–9]

The main covariates of the studied population at allocation are presented with mean ± standard deviation (SD) for Gaussian quantitative variables. Outcomes are shown with 95% confidence intervals. Categorical variables were described using counts by class and frequencies (%). Comparison of outcomes was tested with Student's t-test or the Kruskal-Wallis H-test depending on homoscedasticity or normality of distributions. Categorical data were compared with the chi2 test. All tests were two-sided, and the nominal level of significance was 5%.