Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;2020:4181850. doi: 10.1155/2020/4181850

Table 2.

Diet and Body parameters at allocation.

Mean±σ All groups (n=113) BMI (kg/m2) p value of BMI effect
≤25 (n = 57) 25–30 (n = 38) >30 (n = 18)
Diet parameters
Total energy intake (TEI) (kcal/d) 1492±450 1540 ± 358 1325 ± 378 1689 ± 678 0.038
Protein intake (g/d) 63.6±20.2 65.3 ± 15.1 58.7 ± 20.0 68.8 ± 30.1 0.86
(% TEI) 17.3±4.1 17.2 ± 3.5 17.9 ± 5.2 16.4 ± 3.1 0.71
Carbohydrate intake (g/d) 172.6±61.5 175.3 ± 54.1 156.8 ± 53.7 197.2 ± 85.1 0.65
(% TEI) 46.7±10.4 45.4 ± 9.5 48.1 ± 12.8 47.8 ± 6.5 0.75
Lipid intake (g/d) 59.7±25.4 63.5 ± 22.3 50.6 ± 23.6 66.8 ± 31.8 0.034
% TEI 35.5±8.6 36.8 ± 8.4 33.5 ± 9.8 35.8 ± 5.0 0.14
Body parameters
Body weight (kg) 65.2±12.5 56.6 ± 6.4 68.5 ± 5.8 85.3 ± 10.7 <10−7
Lean mass (LM) (kg) 42.1±5.8 39.6 ± 4.5 43.0 ± 4.8 47.9 ± 6.3 <10−7
(%) 65.2±6.8 69.6 ± 5.3 62.9 ± 3.7 56.3 ± 4.5 <10−7
Fat mass (FM) (kg) 23.0±7.8 17.2 ± 3.7 25.5 ± 3.1 36.2 ± 5.1 <10−7
(%) 34.6±6.7 30.1 ± 5.0 37.3 ± 3.8 43.1 ± 4.4 <10−7
Ratio LM/FM 2.0±0.6 2.4 ± 0.6 1.7 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.3 <10−7
Cell mass (kg) 25.0±4.0 22.8 ± 2.5 25.5 ± 3.3 30.7 ± 3.5 <10−7
Total water (l) 32.9±3.9 31.1 ± 2.6 33.2 ± 2.7 38.1 ± 4.6 <10−7
(%) 51.3±5.4 55.1 ± 4.0 48.5 ± 3.2 44.9 ± 2.8 <10−7
Extracellular water (%) 24.3±3.4 25.7 ± 1.7 23.1 ± 2.1 22.8 ± 6.5 <10−7
Intracellular water (%) 27.1±2.4 28.2 ± 1.8 26.1 ± 2.8 25.6 ± 1.2 <10−7
Tricipital fold thickness (cm) 17.4±8.6 12.5 ± 5.2 18.8 ± 7.2 29.6 ± 6.4 <10−7
Arm circumference (cm) 30.2±3.8 27.7 ± 2.2 31.1 ± 1.7 36.4 ± 3.3 <10−7
Waist circumference (WC) (cm) 84.0±13.5 75.4 ± 7.7 86.8 ± 9.0 105.5 ± 8.9 <10−7
Hip circumference (HC) (cm) 101.1±9.1 95.0 ± 4.9 103.5 ± 5.5 115.7 ± 5.6 <10−7
Ratio WC/HC 0.83±0.09 0.79 ± 0.07 0.84 ± 0.09 0.92 ± 0.08 0.000017

Diet parameters for food intake are expressed in raw value (gram/day) and in % of total energy intake. Body parameters are expressed in raw value (kilogram or liter) and in % of body mass. Comparison of outcomes per BMI group at allocation was tested with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The test was two-sided, and the nominal level of significance was 5%.