Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;2020:4181850. doi: 10.1155/2020/4181850

Table 5.

Variation in biological parameters between one-year follow-up and allocation.

SPA arm (n = 55) CTR arm (n = 49) p value effect of
≤25 25–30 >30 ≤25 25–30 >30 SPA Time BMI
(n = 29) (n = 15) (n = 11) (n = 23) (n = 19) (n = 7)
Glucose mmol/l 0.007 ± 0.446 0.459 ± 0.748 0.749 ± 1.358 −0.089 ± 0.326 0.226 ± 0.394 1.75 ± 2.775 0.23 0.04 <10–6
(0.6%) (8.9%) (15.9%) (−1.6%) (4.4%) (25.9%)
HDL-cholesterol mmol/l −0.438 ± 1.471 −0.241 ± 1.34 −0.542 ± 1.31 −0.436 ± 1.384 −0.333 ± 1.635 −0.028 ± 0.198 0.41 0.027 0.007
(−5.6%) (3.4%) (−13%) (−4.8%) (7%) (−1.3%)
Transthyretin g/l 0.001 ± 0.038 0.009 ± 0.026 −0.005 ± 0.027 0.001 ± 0.033 −0.007 ± 0.031 0.002 ± 0.051 0.041 0.75 0.79
(1%) (3.5%) (−1.5%) (0.8%) (−2%) (3.2%)
C-reactive protein mg/l −0.146 ± 1.142 0.238 ± 2.818 −0.127 ± 1.481 0.264 ± 1.168 −0.135 ± 4.736 −1 ± 5.545 0.11 0.73 <10–7
(11.1%) (27.3%) (8.9%) (41.8%) (41.1%) (−6.6%)
Insulin mUI/l 0.17 ± 3.79 1.97 ± 4.59 2.51 ± 10.19 0.22 ± 6.58 4.47 ± 10.51 4.53 ± 6.24 0.41 0.035 <10–7
(25.7%) (115.7%) (58.4%) (36.1%) (50.9%) (78.4%)
IGF-1 μg/l −0.79 ± 27.51 −26.61 ± 27.25 −18.78 ± 23.9 −13.18 ± 39.9 −12.41 ± 34.83 9.13 ± 16.55 0.32 0.072 0.31
(6.3%) (−19.7%) (−24%) (−4.2%) (−12.2%) (16.5%)
Leptin μg/l −0.03 ± 1.57 −0.02 ± 2.72 −2.42 ± 6.24 0.12 ± 2.38 1.64 ± 6.28 −0.93 ± 3.78 0.66 0.81 <10–7
(15.6%) (9%) (−2.4%) (21.7%) (23.6%) (−7.4%)
Adiponectin mg/l 2.33 ± 4.19 1.29 ± 2.3 0.57 ± 1.3 0.99 ± 2.51 1.15 ± 2.65 0.65 ± 1.01 0.33 0.082 0.022
(32.6%) (17.3%) (18%) (13.9%) (11.5%) (5.6%)
Leptin/adiponectin ratio −0.1 ± 0.27 −0.08 ± 0.52 −1.68 ± 2.92 0.13 ± 1.21 1.2 ± 4.07 −0.27 ± 0.29 0.73 0.91 2 × 10–6
(−2.9%) (−0.4%) (−18%) (24.2%) (16.6%) (−13.6%)
Testosterone nmol/l −0.033 ± 0.299 −0.013 ± 0.098 0.045 ± 0.347 −0.051 ± 0.244 0.015 ± 0.332 0.029 ± 0.757 0.086 0.83 0.27
(−3.6%) (5%) (10.7%) (−5%) (3.4%) (21.8%)
CA 15-3 kU/l 2.32 ± 3.08 0.62 ± 1.78 0.27 ± 1.71 −5.32 ± 28.45 1.56 ± 2.06 2.71 ± 1.48 0.04 0.68 0.07
(18.2%) (6.8%) (4.7%) (1.4%) (12.5%) (14%)

Variation for each parameter is expressed in raw value (one-year follow-up value minus allocation value) and in percentage of the allocation value: + sign indicates an increase and – sign indicates a decrease. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare longitudinal variations between allocation arms (SPA effect), or one-year follow-up (time effect), or BMI groups (BMI effect), but without interaction test because of unequal class sizes. All tests were two-sided, and the nominal level of significance was 5%. Significant p values are indicated in bold.