Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 12;10(4):476–485. doi: 10.1177/2192568219847439

Table 3.

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research by Theme.a

Theme Number of papers (%) r P Number of patients (%) r P
Surgery 866 (58.3) −0.05 .819 2 294 089 (55.7) 0.12 .610
Imaging 260 (17.5) 0.02 .947 18 564 (0.4) −0.76 .001
Prognostication 115 (7.8) 0.45 .042 170 741 (4.1) 0.20 .372
Electrophysiology 91 (6.1) −0.58 .006 6712 (0.2) −0.59 .005
Functional Outcome 61 (4.1) 0.53 .015 8777 (0.2) 0.07 .749
Other 45 (3.0) −0.36 .109 146 309 (3.6) −0.27 .242
Molecular 27 (1.8) 0.33 .139 2457 (0.1) 0.62 .003
Epidemiology 20 (1.4) 0.33 .149 1 469 402 (35.7) 0.42 .061

aSurgery and imaging were the most prevalent themes, together accounting for over 75% of papers published between 1995 and 2015. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to assess trends in percentages of papers and patients for each theme between 1995 and 2015, for which significance testing was conducted and P values are reported. Significant findings are in boldface.