Table 3.
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research by Theme.a
Theme | Number of papers (%) | r | P | Number of patients (%) | r | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Surgery | 866 (58.3) | −0.05 | .819 | 2 294 089 (55.7) | 0.12 | .610 |
Imaging | 260 (17.5) | 0.02 | .947 | 18 564 (0.4) | −0.76 | .001 |
Prognostication | 115 (7.8) | 0.45 | .042 | 170 741 (4.1) | 0.20 | .372 |
Electrophysiology | 91 (6.1) | −0.58 | .006 | 6712 (0.2) | −0.59 | .005 |
Functional Outcome | 61 (4.1) | 0.53 | .015 | 8777 (0.2) | 0.07 | .749 |
Other | 45 (3.0) | −0.36 | .109 | 146 309 (3.6) | −0.27 | .242 |
Molecular | 27 (1.8) | 0.33 | .139 | 2457 (0.1) | 0.62 | .003 |
Epidemiology | 20 (1.4) | 0.33 | .149 | 1 469 402 (35.7) | 0.42 | .061 |
aSurgery and imaging were the most prevalent themes, together accounting for over 75% of papers published between 1995 and 2015. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to assess trends in percentages of papers and patients for each theme between 1995 and 2015, for which significance testing was conducted and P values are reported. Significant findings are in boldface.