Table 2.
Type | Measure | Method | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Negative welfare | Feather loss | Number of birds, out of 50 samples randomly selected from the flock, with visible bare skin >5 cm in the head/neck and back/vent areas | [1] |
Beak trimming | Whether beak is routinely trimmed before 10 days of age (1) or not (0) | ||
Antagonistic behaviour | Number of antagonistic behaviour (aggressive behaviour and injurious feather pecking) observed during the farm visit | ||
Flightiness | Whether the flock is best described as flighty (2), cautious (1) or calm (0) | ||
Mortality | Mortality rate of the flock immediately previous to that observed during the farm visit | ||
Resource outcome | Litter score | Condition of litter, as evaluated in the scale of 1–6: 1: Completely dry and friable; 2: Small moist/capped areas around drinkers/pop holes; 3: Large capped areas but sufficient space to dust bathe; 4: Largely wet or capped with few friable areas; 5: Largely capped or wet; 6: Largely wet or soggy. |
[16] |
Positive welfare | Mood dimension score | General “mood” of the flock, as expressed by the first principal component resulting from quantitative behavioural assessment | [16] |
For negative welfare indices, a larger value indicates reduced animal welfare. For mood dimension score, a larger value indicates improved animal welfare.