Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;10(4):610. doi: 10.3390/ani10040610

Table 2.

Outcome measures used for validation of resource tier framework.

Type Measure Method Source
Negative welfare Feather loss Number of birds, out of 50 samples randomly selected from the flock, with visible bare skin >5 cm in the head/neck and back/vent areas [1]
Beak trimming Whether beak is routinely trimmed before 10 days of age (1) or not (0)
Antagonistic behaviour Number of antagonistic behaviour (aggressive behaviour and injurious feather pecking) observed during the farm visit
Flightiness Whether the flock is best described as flighty (2), cautious (1) or calm (0)
Mortality Mortality rate of the flock immediately previous to that observed during the farm visit
Resource outcome Litter score Condition of litter, as evaluated in the scale of 1–6:
1: Completely dry and friable;
2: Small moist/capped areas around drinkers/pop holes;
3: Large capped areas but sufficient space to dust bathe;
4: Largely wet or capped with few friable areas;
5: Largely capped or wet;
6: Largely wet or soggy.
[16]
Positive welfare Mood dimension score General “mood” of the flock, as expressed by the first principal component resulting from quantitative behavioural assessment [16]

For negative welfare indices, a larger value indicates reduced animal welfare. For mood dimension score, a larger value indicates improved animal welfare.