Table 4.
Primary, secondary and safety study outcomes
| Cohort | Conventional group | Orthèse Diabète | P value | |
| Primary outcome | ||||
| Blinded assessment of wound closure of the index plantar ulcer at the 3-month visit* | ITT | 19 (33) | 19 (35) | 0.79 |
| Blinded assessment of wound closure of the index plantar ulcer at the 3-month visit | PP | 18 (34) | 17 (37) | 0.76 |
| Secondary outcomes | ||||
| Closure of the index plantar ulcer | ||||
| 1-month visit | ITT | 4 (7) | 9 (17) | 0.11 |
| 2-month visit | ITT | 15 (26) | 17 (31) | 0.51 |
| 6-month visit | ITT | 28 (48) | 31 (57) | 0.33 |
| Closure of all initial plantar ulcers | ||||
| 1-month visit | ITT | 4 (7) | 8 (15) | 0.19 |
| 2-month visit | ITT | 12 (21) | 13 (24) | 0.82 |
| 3-month visit | ITT | 17 (30) | 18 (33) | 0.84 |
| 6-month visit | ITT | 24 (42) | 23 (43) | 0.96 |
| Relative area reduction of the index plantar ulcer (%) | ||||
| 1-month visit | ITT | 63 (52 to 74) | 58 (47 to 70) | 0.56 |
| 2-month visit | ITT | 76 (67 to 85) | 77 (68 to 87) | 0.88 |
| 3-month visit | ITT | 85 (76 to 94) | 85 (76 to 94) | 0.96 |
| 6-month visit | ITT | 87 (79 to 94) | 92 (85 to 99) | 0.33 |
| Estimated time to reach closure of the index plantar ulcer (days) | ITT | 81 (61 to 102) | 85 (66 to 103) | 0.80 |
| New plantar ulcer | ITT | 14 (25) | 14 (27) | 0.82 |
| Ipsilateral limb-amputation | ITT | 2 (4) | 5 (10) | 0.20 |
| Infectious complication | ITT | 8 (14) | 7 (13) | 0.68 |
| Safety | ||||
| Any adverse events | Safety | 16 (28) | 19 (28) | 0.97 |
| Any serious adverse events | Safety | 41 (72) | 48 (72) | 0.97 |
| Any adverse events related to offloading device | Safety | 2 (4) | 10 (15) | 0.03 |
| Adverse events leading to discontinuation | Safety | 0 | 3 (4) | 0.11 |
| All-cause hospitalization | Safety | 23 (40) | 18 (27) | 0.11 |
| Death | Safety | 1 (2) | 3 (4) | 0.39 |
Data presented as number (percentage) of participants and compared using χ2 test, except relative area reduction and estimated time to reach closure of the index plantar ulcer, which are presented as median (25th, 75th percentiles) and compared by using Wilcoxon test. P<0.05 was considered as significant.
*End points were assessed at 2-month visit in 13 participants for whom no data were available at 3-month visit in the ITT cohort analysis (see figure 2).
ITT, intention to treat; PP, per protocol.