Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 27;35(5):501–516. doi: 10.1007/s12250-020-00222-5

Table 2.

Laboratory diagnostic methods for AiV.

Laboratory diagnostic method Advantages Disadvantages
Electron microscopy Visualization of viral particles Labour and tedious. Useless for environmental samples
Cell culture Variety of sensitive cell lines. Determination of infectivity. Quantitative (TCID50) Labour and tedious. Effect of inhibitors/contaminants
ELISAa Sensitivity. Especificity Effect of inhibitors. Limited use for environmental samples
LAMPb Sensitivity. Especificity. Rapidity. Isothermal conditions Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Effect of inhibitors
RT-PCRc Sensitivity. Especificity. Rapidity Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Effect of inhibitors
RT-nested PCR Sensitivity. Especificity. Valid for genotyping coupled with sequencing Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Effect of inhibitors
RT-qPCRd Sensitivity. Especificity. Rapidity. Quantification Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Need of standard for quantification. Expensive
Digital RT-PCR Sensitivity. Especificity. Rapidity. Absolute quantification Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Hard optimization. Expensive
Pyrosequencing Sensitivity. Universal detection Complex sample processing and bioinformatic analysis. Expensive

aELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

bLAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

cRT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

dRT-qPCR, real time quantitative RT-PCR.