Table 2.
Laboratory diagnostic methods for AiV.
| Laboratory diagnostic method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Electron microscopy | Visualization of viral particles | Labour and tedious. Useless for environmental samples |
| Cell culture | Variety of sensitive cell lines. Determination of infectivity. Quantitative (TCID50) | Labour and tedious. Effect of inhibitors/contaminants |
| ELISAa | Sensitivity. Especificity | Effect of inhibitors. Limited use for environmental samples |
| LAMPb | Sensitivity. Especificity. Rapidity. Isothermal conditions | Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Effect of inhibitors |
| RT-PCRc | Sensitivity. Especificity. Rapidity | Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Effect of inhibitors |
| RT-nested PCR | Sensitivity. Especificity. Valid for genotyping coupled with sequencing | Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Effect of inhibitors |
| RT-qPCRd | Sensitivity. Especificity. Rapidity. Quantification | Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Need of standard for quantification. Expensive |
| Digital RT-PCR | Sensitivity. Especificity. Rapidity. Absolute quantification | Detection of infective and non-infective particles. Hard optimization. Expensive |
| Pyrosequencing | Sensitivity. Universal detection | Complex sample processing and bioinformatic analysis. Expensive |
aELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
bLAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
cRT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
dRT-qPCR, real time quantitative RT-PCR.