TABLE 7.

Invariance testing between the different genders for the ESEM Model (Model 8).

	Model	χ 2	df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA		SRMR	AIC	aBIC	Model Comparison	Δχ 2	Δ CFI	Δ RMSEA	Δ SRMR
M1	Configural Invariance	108.34	86	0.97	0.96	0.04	[0.001, 0.063]	0.04	9783.09	9836.50	–	–	–
M2	Metric Invariance	126.93	106	0.98	0.97	0.04	[0.001, 0.057]	0.05	9761.69	9803.73	M2 vs. M1	18.59*	0.01	0.00	0.01
M3	Scalar Invariance	153.44	116	0.96	0.95	0.05	[0.023, 0.064]	0.06	9768.20	9804.56	M3 vs. M1	45.10*	−0.01	0.01	0.02
											M3 vs. M2	26.51	−0.02	0.01	0.01

*Non-significant differences (p < 0.01).