Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;7:2055668320918130. doi: 10.1177/2055668320918130

Table 2.

Summary of outcomes measures.

DIRECT EFFECTS Brokaw et al.25 Prange-Lasonder et al.15 Yap et al.18 Cappello et al.26 Radder et al.34 Yurkewichet al.35 TRAINING EFFECTS Thielbaret al.29 Chen et al.27 Prange-Lasonder15 Vanoglioet al.32 Bernocchiet al.31 Scott et al.28 Kimet al.30 Milia,etal.33
Impairments Impairments
• Joint mobility
Range of motion (extension) + +
Range of motion (flexion)
Thumb abduction
• Muscular Strength
Grip Strength ? + +
Pinch Strength ? ? +
Motricity Index + +
•Arm motor control
Reach path ratio of the hand +
•Hand pain
Visual analog Scale
• Spasticity
Modified Ashworth scale a) Elbowb) Wrist c) Finger
Ashworth Spasticity Indexa) Finger flexorsb) Opponents of the thumbc) Wrist flexors
• Edema
Circumferencea) Forearmb) Wristc) Finger
Activity Limitation Activity Limitation
Box and block test + +
Nine Hole Peg Test + + +
Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function Testa) Picking up small objectsb) Lift cane
+ ?
?
Wolf Motor Function Test ? +
Activity of daily living tasks ?
Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale
Arm Motor Ability Test +
Finger velocitya) in flexionb) in extension
+
Quick-Dash +
Stroke Impact scalea) Hand subscaleb) Recovery subscale
+ +
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Testa) manipulation of small objectsb) uplift strength
+
+
Action Research Arm Test +
Motor Activity Log
Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment Hand ? +
Barthel Index +
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity ? +
Fugl-Meyer Hand
Functional Independence Measure + +

+Significant p < 0.05; – not significant with p > 0.05; ? information not available on the p-value. Effect size <0.2; effect size ≥0.2; effect size ≥0.5; effect size ≥0.8.