Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;24(3):495–502. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02068-7

Table 2.

Comparison of operative characteristics of elderly vs non-elderly patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular porcine dermal matrix

Overall series Propensity-matched series
Non-elderly, N = 95 (%) Elderly, N = 41 (%) p value Non-elderly, N = 35 (%) Elderly N = 35 (%) p value
Type of incision
 Midline 73 (77.7%) 31 (75.6%) 0.794 25 (71.4%) 27 (77.1%) 0.584
 Flank 2 (2.1%) 1 (2.4%) 1.000 0 (0.0%) 1 (2.9%) 1.000
 Para median 5 (5.3%) 4 (9.8%) 0.453 2 (5.7%) 4 (11.4%) 0.673
 Left lower quadrant 0 2 (4.9%) 0.090 0 1 (2.9%) 1.000
 Left upper quadrant 3 (3.2%) 1 (2.4%) 1.000 3 (8.6%) 0 0.239
 Right upper quadrant 5 (5.3%) 0 0.322 2 (5.7%) 0 0.492
 Right lower quadrant 2 (2.1%) 1 (2.4%) 1.000 0 1 (2.9%) 1.000
 Bilateral subcostal 7 (7.4%) 1 (2.4%) 0.434 3 (8.6%) 1 (2.9%) 0.614
 Lysis of adhesions 73 (76.8%) 27 (65.9%) 0.182 28 (80.0%) 22 (62.9%) 0.112
 Intestinal resection 19 (20.2%) 8 (20.0%) 0.977 9 (25.7%) 6 (17.6%) 0.417
 Fistula take down 7 (7.4%) 2 (4.9%) 0.722 4 (11.8%) 1 (2.9%) 0.198
 Stoma take down 10 (10.6%) 3 (7.3%) 0.753 4 (11.4%) 3 (8.6%) 1.000
 Lateral component separation 36 (37.9%) 16 (39.0%) 0.900 13 (37.1%) 15 (42.9%) 0.625
Mesh placement technique
 Sublay (retro-rectus) 58 (63.7%) 25 (64.1%) 0.026* 25 (75.8%) 20 (60.6%) 0.255
 Onlay 10 (11.0%) 0 3 (9.1%) 0
 Bridge 18 (19.8%) 7 (17.9%) 5 (15.2%) 6 (18.2%)
 Underlay 5 (5.5%) 7 (17.9%) 0 7 (21.2%)
 Wound class II/III/IV 46 (48.4%) 18 (43.9%) 0.628 18 (51.4%) 16 (45.7%) 0.632
 Panniculectomy 5 (5.3%) 1 (2.4%) 0.667 1 (2.9%) 1 (2.9%) 1.000
 Excision of redundant skin 14 (14.7%) 11 (26.8%) 0.094 3 (8.6%) 10 (28.6%) 0.062
 Primary wound closure 78 (82.1%) 34 (82.9%) 0.908 30 (85.7%) 30 (85.7%) 1.000
 Mesh size (cm2) 449.8 ± 257.5 544.81 ± 580.9 0.241 457.55 ± 268.7 571.19 ± 626.4 0.377
 Number of drains 1.99 ± 1.3 2.21 ± 1.1 0.355 1.91 ± 1.1 2.24 ± 1.1 0.235

*Significant at p < 0.05