Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 27;87(1):125–130. doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0552-z

Table 2.

Patient characteristics and performer experience in relation to the success rate and quality assessment

Success of first attempt (n = 86) Quality of technical conditions (n = 76)#
Success (n = 45) Failure (n = 41) P-value Good quality (n = 45) Inadequate quality (n = 31) P-value
Patient characteristics
  Gestational age (week), median (IQR) 28.3 (26.7–29.4) 28.4 (25.9–29.9) 0.92 28.3 (26.6–29.6) 28.1 (27.0–30.0) 0.70
  Birth weight (gm), median (IQR) 1030 (763–1300) 1000 (750–1328) 0.94 1050 (788–1313) 1000 (800–1300) 0.76
  Birth weight <10th percentile, n (%) 13 (29) 12 (29) 1.00 12 (27) 12 (39) 0.32
  Postnatal age (h), median (IQR) 3.3 (2.1–11.6) 3.3 (2.1–7.3) 0.58 3.5 (2.5–9.6) 3.2 (2.0–10.7) 0.53
  Male gender, n (%) 25 (56) 24 (59) 0.83 24 (53) 21 (68) 0.24
Procedure characteristics
  Performer of first attempt is neonatologist, n (%) 33 (73) 13 (33)a <0.001 29 (64) 16 (52) 0.34
  Good quality of technical conditions, n (%) 34 (76) 11 (35)b 0.001
  Success of the first attempt, n (%) 34 (76) 11 (35) 0.001

aFor one procedure the performer was not reported

bFor ten procedures quality of technical conditions was missing