Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 17;30(1):111–119. doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01282-3

Table 2.

Comparison of resource consumption and complications between PLS and non-PLS groups

Variable All
n = 1309
PLS
n = 32
Non-PLS
n = 1277
P value
Device
   Arterial line 309 (24%) 26 (81%) 283 (22%) < 0.001
   CV line 194 (15%) 21 (66%) 173 (14%) < 0.001
   Foley catheter 486 (37%) 28 (88%) 458 (36%) < 0.001
Therapeutic resource
   MV 260 (20%) 26 (81%) 234 (18%) < 0.001
   Vasoactive drug 151 (12%) 21 (66%) 130 (10%) < 0.001
   RRT 17 (1%) 7 (22%) 10 (1%) < 0.001
   ECMO 3 (0.2%) 2 (6%) 1 (0.1%) 0.002
Surgical intervention
   Tracheostomy 7 (0.5%) 5 (16%) 2 (0.2%) < 0.001
   Gastrostomy 1 (0.1%) 1 (3%) 0 0.02
Complication and outcome
   CRBSI 6 (0.5%) 4 (13%) 2 (0.2%) 0.33*
   VAP 8 (1%) 6 (19%) 2 (0.2%) 0.005*
   CAUTI 11 (1%) 6 (19%) 5 (0.4%) 0.048*
   CPR in the ICU 4 (0.3%) 0 4 (0.3%) 0.52*
   Mortality 17 (1.2%) 3 (9%) 14 (1%)

PLS, prolonged length of stay; n, number; P value, probability of finding; CV, central venous; MV, mechanical ventilation; RRT, renal replacement therapy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; CRBSI, catheter-related bloodstream infection; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia; CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract infection; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ICU, intensive care unit

Values provided as numbers (percentages) for categorical variables

*P values for time-dependent variables calculated using log-rank test