Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;30(7):2684–2692. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04551-y

Table 3.

Comparison of compliance, raw, PIP, and Pplateau values in groups

T1 T2 T3 T4
Compliance Group C (n = 30) 34.6 ± 8.1 27.3 ± 5.6 39 ± 9 37.4 ± 8.2b
Group R (n = 30) 35.8 ± 11.3 28.2 ± 6.3 40.2 ± 11.1 45.6±15c
P 0.988 0.888 0.941 0.043a
Raw (cmH2O lt−1 sn−1) Group C (n = 30) 16.6 ± 5.7 15.2 ± 3.6 13.1 ± 3.2d 13.1 ± 3.1d
Group R (n = 30) 16.2 ± 5.6 16.1 ± 4.4 14 ± 3.6d 14.4 ± 4.8e
P 0.629 0.474 0.368 0.38
PIP (cmH2O) Group C (n = 30) 26.2 ± 4.5 30.3 ± 3.8f 24.5 ± 3.3 25 ± 3.3
Group R (n = 30) 26.4 ± 4.2 30.1 ± 3.4f 24.7 ± 4.7 24 ± 4.1
P 0.795 0.818 0.97 0.176
Pplateau (cmH2O) Group C (n = 30) 22.5 ± 4.7 26.1 ± 5.6f 21.3 ± 3 21.8 ± 3.2
Group R (n = 30) 23.4 ± 3.8 27.6 ± 3.5f 21.5 ± 4.6 20.4 ± 4
P 0.543 0.338 0.87 0.132

Raw, air way resistance; PIP, peak inspiratory pressure; Pplateau, plateau pressure. Values given as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between groups used Mann-Whitney U test; comparisons within groups used Wilcoxon sign test

aComparison between groups is statistically significant

bWithin groups, comparisons with T2 are statistically significant

cWithin groups, comparisons with T1, T2, and T3 are statistically significant

dWithin groups, comparisons with T1 and T2 are statistically significant

eWithin groups, comparisons with T1 statistically significant

fWithin groups, comparisons with T1, T3, and T4 are statistically significant