Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;8:e9025. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9025

Table 4. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the relationships between specific lifestyle classes with risk of diabetes.

Main analyses Sensitivity analysesa
Crude OR (95% CI) P Adjusted OR (95% CI)b P Crude OR (95% CI) P Adjusted OR (95% CI)b P
Males
(Reference: Healthy lifestyle)
Cumulate harmful habits 1.91 (1.43–2.55) <0.001 2.09 (1.54–2.83) <0.001 2.60 (1.79–3.76) <0.001 2.69 (1.83–3.94) <0.001
Poor sleep and risky habits 2.99 (2.10–4.27) <0.001 2.62 (1.79–3.82) <0.001 3.87 (2.44–6.14) <0.001 3.29 (2.02–5.34) <0.001
(Reference: Cumulate harmful habits)
Poor sleep and risky habits 1.57 (1.08–2.27) 0.018 1.25 (0.84–1.87) 0.271 1.49 (0.94–2.36) 0.088 1.22 (0.75–2.00) 0.421
Females
(Reference: Healthy lifestyle)
Inactive, daytime dysfunction 2.10 (1.02–4.32) 0.044 2.41 (1.06–5.45) 0.035 2.15 (0.74–6.25) 0.160 3.14 (1.00–9.84) 0.050
Poor sleep habits 3.61 (2.28–5.71) <0.001 1.92 (1.16–3.27) 0.011 3.93 (1.96–7.88) <0.001 2.48 (1.18–5.22) 0.017
(Reference: Inactive, daytime dysfunction)
Poor sleep habits 1.72 (0.79–3.75) 0.175 0.81 (0.33–1.98) 0.645 1.83 (0.57–5.83) 0.307 0.79 (0.23–2.76) 0.711

Notes.

OR
odds ratio
CI
confidence interval
a

Sensitivity analyses by excluding patients with self-reported history of cardiometabolic diseases (including hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes).

b

Estimates were adjusted for age, education level, family history of diabetes, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure.