Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;86(6):783–791. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz346

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Patients Diagnosed With Aneurysm on Initial Imaging and Those With Delayed Aneurysm Diagnosis, n = 444

Aneurysm identified on initial imaging Delayed diagnosis of aneurysm P value
Number of patients 431 13
Age, mean (SD) 54.8 ± 13.4 53.9 ± 16.2 .8*
Female sex 307 (71%) 8 (62%) .5
Modified Fisher >.9
 1 36 (8%) 1 (8%)
 2 25 (6%) 1 (8%)
 3 114 (26%) 4 (31%)
 4 256 (59%) 7 (54%)
Hijdra score, median (IQR)
 SAH 21.5 (13.5-25.5) 14.0 (12.5-27.5) .4**
 IVH 2.0 (0.5-2.5) 2.0 (0.0-3.5) .7**
 Total 24.0 (15.0-28.0) 19.0 (12.5-29.5) .4**
Perimesencephalic SAH pattern on CT 7 (2%) 0 (0%) .6
ICH 89 (21%) 2 (15%) .6
WFNS ≥ 3 173 (40%) 7 (54%) .3
CSF diversion on admission 310 (72%) 8 (62%) .4
Current or former tobacco user 229 (58%) 5 (38%) .3

Patients in either group were compared and found to have no clinical factors that were statistically significantly different (P > .05) between patients with aneurysms diagnosed on initial imaging work-up and those diagnosed on a second angiogram. As such, these patient groups were combined for subsequent analysis and model derivation. Variables are shown as either number and percentage or average +/– standard deviation. Statistical comparisons are via Student's t-test (**) or chi-squared test () as appropriate.