Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Mar 19;34(4):678–699. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1733097

Table 4.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Results with Global Cognitive Status and EMA n-back Variables as predictors of the Objective and Subjective Clinical Measures

Dependent Measures
Objective Subjective
Variables Executive Composite Prospective Memorya Performance-based Everyday Functioningb Self-report Cognitive Failuresc Self-report Functional Statusc
Model 1
RBANS total .39* .23 −.03 −.12 −.25
EMA average .17 −.16 .61* −.14 .08
 Total R2 .18* .08 .37* .03 .07
Model 2
RBANS total .41* .19 −.02 −.03 −.14
EMA average .19 −.20 .63* −.07 .16
IIV .13 −.43* .07 .51** .53**
 Change in R2 .02 .18* .01 .25** .27**
 Total R2 .20 .26 .37 .28 .34

Note. Standardized Beta Coefficients presented for predictors. RBANS = Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Status; EMA = ecological momentary assessment; IIV – intra-individual variability. See methods section and Table 1 for description of tests used to define each construct.

a

n = 32

b

higher score represents greater self-reported difficulties; n = 30

c

n = 17

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.