Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;9(2):188–203. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2020.02.14

Table 5. Single arm meta-analysis for ORR in each treatment according to PD-L1 expression subgroup.

Treatment ORR 95% CI (lower) 95% CI (upper)
PD-L1 ≥50%
   Chemo 0.35 0.32 0.37
   Nivo 0.45 0.39 0.51
   Nivo + Ipi 0.44 0.38 0.51
   Atez 0.38 0.29 0.48
   Atez + Chemo 0.64 0.54 0.75
   Pembro 0.42 0.38 0.47
   Pembro + Chemo 0.63 0.56 0.70
PD-L 1–49%
   Chemo 0.32 0.29 0.34
   Nivo 0.36 0.31 0.41
   Nivo + Ipi 0.27 0.20 0.33
   Atez + Chemo 0.47 0.40 0.55
   Pembro 0.16 0.12 0.20
   Pembro + Chemo 0.52 0.46 0.58
PD-L1 positive
   Chemo 0.33 0.31 0.35
   Nivo 0.40 0.36 0.44
   Nivo + Ipi 0.36 0.31 0.41
   Atez 0.29 0.24 0.35
   Atez + Chemo 0.52 0.46 0.58
   Pembro 0.27 0.24 0.31
   Pembro + Chemo 0.56 0.50 0.62
PD-L1 negative
   Chemo 0.29 0.26 0.32
   Nivo + Chemo 0.38 0.31 0.45
   Nivo + Ipi 0.27 0.21 0.34
   Atez + Chemo 0.44 0.38 0.50
   Pembro + Chemo 0.47 0.41 0.54

Chemo, chemotherapy; Carem + Chemo, caremlizumab plus chemotherapy; Nivo, nivolumab; Nivo + Ipi, nivolumab plus ipilimumab; Nivo + Chemo, nivolumab plus chemotherapy; Atez, atezolizumab; Atez + Chemo, atezolizumab plus chemotherapy; Pembro, pembrolizumab; Pembro + Chemo, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy; ORR, objective response rate; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1.