Table 3.
Comparison of cLBR of flexible GnRH antagonist protocol vs. GnRH agonist long protocol using multivariable regression analysis in patients stratified by AFC and age.
| Non-adjusted | P | Adjusted | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal AFC ≤7 | ||||
| Female age <30 y | 0.27 (0.12, 0.59) | 0.0012 | 0.29 (0.11, 0.74) | 0.0096 |
| Female age ≥30 y, <40 y | 0.80 (0.50, 1.27) | 0.3379 | 0.87 (0.52, 1.45) | 0.5945 |
| Female age ≥40 y | 0.74 (0.14, 3.91) | 0.7252 | 0.54 (0.08, 3.38) | 0.5069 |
| Basal AFC >7, ≤24 | ||||
| Female age <30 y | 1.04 (0.83, 1.30) | 0.74 | 1.02 (0.81, 1.28) | 0.8557 |
| Female age ≥30 y, <40 y | 1.06 (0.58, 1.97) | 0.5685 | 1.05 (0.85, 1.29) | 0.6327 |
| Female age ≥40 y | 0.88 (0.26, 2.97) | 0.8341 | 0.51 (0.10, 2.60) | 0.4194 |
| Basal AFC >24 | ||||
| Female age <30 y | 1.52 (0.96, 2.43) | 0.075 | 1.78 (1.07, 2.96) | 0.0269 |
| Female age ≥30 y, <40 y | 1.06 (0.58, 1.97) | 0.8555 | 1.01 (0.50, 2.02) | 0.9789 |
| Female age ≥40 y | NA | NA | NA | |
The italic values represent that the differences are statistically significant.