Skip to main content
. 2020 May 8;11:287. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00287

Table 3.

Comparison of cLBR of flexible GnRH antagonist protocol vs. GnRH agonist long protocol using multivariable regression analysis in patients stratified by AFC and age.

Non-adjusted P Adjusted P
Basal AFC ≤7
Female age <30 y 0.27 (0.12, 0.59) 0.0012 0.29 (0.11, 0.74) 0.0096
Female age ≥30 y, <40 y 0.80 (0.50, 1.27) 0.3379 0.87 (0.52, 1.45) 0.5945
Female age ≥40 y 0.74 (0.14, 3.91) 0.7252 0.54 (0.08, 3.38) 0.5069
Basal AFC >7, ≤24
Female age <30 y 1.04 (0.83, 1.30) 0.74 1.02 (0.81, 1.28) 0.8557
Female age ≥30 y, <40 y 1.06 (0.58, 1.97) 0.5685 1.05 (0.85, 1.29) 0.6327
Female age ≥40 y 0.88 (0.26, 2.97) 0.8341 0.51 (0.10, 2.60) 0.4194
Basal AFC >24
Female age <30 y 1.52 (0.96, 2.43) 0.075 1.78 (1.07, 2.96) 0.0269
Female age ≥30 y, <40 y 1.06 (0.58, 1.97) 0.8555 1.01 (0.50, 2.02) 0.9789
Female age ≥40 y NA NA NA

The italic values represent that the differences are statistically significant.