Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;10(2):135–144. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2020.02.11

Table S3. Comparison of TAVR with SAPIEN 3 OR EVOLUT R/PRO versus SAVR at 1-year.

Outcome Studies Event rate Odds ratio (95% CI) I2 P value
TAVR SAVR
All-cause mortality 2 22/1,221 (1.8%) 31/1,132 (2.7%) 0.65 (0.37–1.17) 5% 0.15
Cardiac mortality 2 16/1,221 (1.3%) 27/1,132 (2.4%) 0.55 (0.29–1.02) 0% 0.06
Stroke 2 36/1,221 (2.9%) 43/1,132 (3.8%) 0.67 (0.28–1.62) 63% 0.37
Atrial fibrillation 2 100/1,221 (8.1%) 410/1,132 (36.2%) 0.15 (0.11–0.21) 36% <0.0001
Permanent pacemaker 2 177/1,221 (14.5%) 69/1,132 (6.09%) 2.23 (0.94–5.31) 86% 0.007
All-cause rehospitalization 2 59/1,221 (4.8%) 93/1,132 (8.2%) 0.56 (0.40–0.79) 0% 0.001
Mod-severe paravalvular regurgitation 2 18/871 (2.06%) 4/708 (0.6%) 3.00 (0.60–15.01) 48% 0.18

CI, confidence interval; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement.