Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;9(2):329–341. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.09

Table 3. Multivariable analyses of factors associated with survival outcomes.

OS DFS
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
ER (–) vs. ER (+) * 0.302 1.871 (1.061–3.300) 0.030
PR (–) vs. PR (+) * 0.215 1.826 (1.032–3.232) 0.039
Ki67
   >14% vs. ≤14% * 0.662 * 0.189
Molecular subtype 0.000 * 0.227
   Luminal B vs. Luminal A 6.160 (1.879–20.190) 0.003 * 0.056
   HER2-overexpressing vs. Luminal A 11.562 (3.119–42.857) 0.000 * 0.931
   TNBC vs. Luminal A 12.091 (3.623–40.351) 0.000 * 0.561
The number of axillary involved lymph nodes 0.013 0.000
   N1 vs. no 1.177 (0.528–2.624) 0.691 0.941 (0.508–1.741) 0.846
   N2 vs. no 1.855 (0.879–3.914) 0.105 2.207 (1.298–3.753) 0.003
   N3 vs. no 3.202 (1.489–6.888) 0.003 3.331 (1.905–5.824) 0.000
Involvement of infraclavicular lymph node
   No vs. yes 0.544 (0.305–0.973) 0.040 0.568 (0.354–0.913) 0.019
SCLD
   No vs. yes * 0.403 * 0.405

*, HR (95% CI) was not given when P>0.05 in Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progestational hormone; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer; SCLD, supraclavicular lymph node dissection.