Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 May 14;9(20):e00220-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00220-20

Draft Genome Sequences of Chlamydiales Bacterium STE3 and Neochlamydia sp. Strain AcF84, Endosymbionts of Acanthamoeba spp.

Stephan Köstlbacher a, Stefanie Michels a, Alexander Siegl a,*, Frederik Schulz a,*, Daryl Domman a,*, Somchai Jongwutiwes b, Chaturong Putaporntip b, Matthias Horn a, Astrid Collingro a,
Editor: Irene L G Newtonc
PMCID: PMC7225534  PMID: 32409535

Chlamydiales bacterium STE3 and Neochlamydia sp. strain AcF84 are obligate intracellular symbionts of Acanthamoeba spp. isolated from the biofilm of a littoral cave wall and gills from striped tiger leaf fish, respectively. We report the draft genome sequences of these two environmental chlamydiae affiliated with the family Parachlamydiaceae.

ABSTRACT

Chlamydiales bacterium STE3 and Neochlamydia sp. strain AcF84 are obligate intracellular symbionts of Acanthamoeba spp. isolated from the biofilm of a littoral cave wall and gills from striped tiger leaf fish, respectively. We report the draft genome sequences of these two environmental chlamydiae affiliated with the family Parachlamydiaceae.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Members of the Parachlamydiaceae are related to the well-known human and animal pathogens Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Parachlamydiaceae show the obligate intracellular lifestyle of chlamydiae but thrive as symbionts of free-living amoebae in the environment (1, 2). The effect of these environmental chlamydiae on their amoeba hosts ranges from beneficial to adverse depending on the bacterial strain, host organism, and environmental conditions (35). Their analysis helps to understand better the basic biology and evolution of all chlamydiae (2, 6). Here, we provide draft genome sequences of two amoeba symbionts affiliated with the Parachlamydiaceae.

Chlamydiales bacterium STE3 resides in Acanthamoeba sp. strain STE3, which was isolated from the biofilm of a littoral cave wall in Hawaii. Acanthamoeba sp. strain AcF84, harboring Neochlamydia sp. strain AcF84, was obtained from gill samples of Pristolepis fasciatus (striped tiger leaf fish) in Thailand. After axenization (7), amoebae were cultivated in peptone-yeast-glucose medium at 20°C (8). Prior to symbiont DNA isolation, amoeba cells were lysed, and host DNA was digested as described previously (9). Bacterial DNA was purified using chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction with isopropanol precipitation (9, 10) (STE3) and the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) as recommended by the manufacturer (AcF84). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT kit (Illumina) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Trimming and quality control of reads were conducted with BBMap v35.43 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/) (bbduk minlen = 50, qtrim = rl, trimq = 25, ktrim = r, k = 25, mink = 11, hdist = 1) and FastQC v0.11.4 (11). Assemblies were performed with SPAdes v3.x.0 (Table 1) (12), screened for contamination with CheckM (13), and annotated with ConsPred v1.10 and v1.21 (Table 1) (14). Default parameters were used unless noted otherwise.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics and accession numbers of the two chlamydial symbiont genomes

Characteristic Data for:
Chlamydiales bacterium STE3 Neochlamydia sp. AcF84
Assembly SPAdes v3.1.0 SPAdes v3.5.0
Annotation ConsPred v1.10 ConsPred v1.21
Genome coverage (×) 2,487 810
Avg read length (bp) 120 120
No. of contigsa 63 84
Contig N50 (bp) 79,518 63,140
Completeness (%) 98.28 91.38
G+C content (%) 38.72 38.02
Assembly size (bp) 2,223,901 2,503,381
No. of coding sequencesb 2,009 1,970
No. of rRNAs 3 3
No. of tRNAs 37 36
GenBank accession no. VKHO00000000 VJOT00000000
a

Contigs of >800 bp.

b

CDSs of >150 bp.

The draft genome sizes and detailed information for both genomes are listed in Table 1. Both genomes show hallmarks of chlamydial genomes, e.g., a reduction in genes for metabolic pathways, but encode ATP/ADP translocases, and, among other virulence factors, a type III secretion apparatus including many potential effectors.

Chlamydiales bacterium STE3 and the amoeba symbiont HS-T3 (15, 16) (tentatively classified as a Thermochlamydia sp. [17]) form a separate lineage affiliated with the Parachlamydiaceae in 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic trees. In contrast to strain HS-T3, STE3 seems unable to infect mammalian or insect cell lines (15, 16). Based on an analysis of groups of orthologs using OrthoFinder (18), Chlamydiales bacterium STE3 shares 1,838 coding DNA sequences (CDSs) (91.5%) with other chlamydiae; 81 of these are unique to STE3 and HS-T3.

Neochlamydia sp. AcF84 and its closest relative, Neochlamydia sp. EPS4, share 1,579 CDSs (80.2%), including genes of the large effector gene families NEX1 and NEX2 (19). As seen in other Neochlamydia genomes, AcF84 encodes many transposases and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), in particular, group II introns associated with reverse transcriptase/maturase proteins.

These two genome sequences will enable a better understanding of the biology and evolution of ubiquitous protist-associated chlamydiae.

Data availability.

The draft genome sequences of the two chlamydial symbionts have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers VKHO00000000 and VJOT00000000. Reads are available at the SRA database under the accession numbers PRJNA492197 and PRJNA489593. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Gabriele Schwammel for assistance in the lab.

This study was supported by Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project grant P 32112 to A.C.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Horn M. 2008. Chlamydiae as symbionts in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Microbiol 62:113–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Taylor-Brown A, Vaughan L, Greub G, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. 2015. Twenty years of research into Chlamydia-like organisms: a revolution in our understanding of the biology and pathogenicity of members of the phylum Chlamydiae. Pathog Dis 73:1–15. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftu009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ishida K, Sekizuka T, Hayashida K, Matsuo J, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M, Nakamura S, Yamazaki T, Yoshida M, Takahashi K, Nagai H, Sugimoto C, Yamaguchi H. 2014. Amoebal endosymbiont Neochlamydia genome sequence illuminates the bacterial role in the defense of the host amoebae against Legionella pneumophila. PLoS One 9:e95166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Greub G, La Scola B, Raoult D. 2003. Parachlamydia acanthamoeba is endosymbiotic or lytic for Acanthamoeba polyphaga depending on the incubation temperature. Ann N Y Acad Sci 990:628–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.König L, Wentrup C, Schulz F, Wascher F, Escola S, Swanson MS, Buchrieser C, Horn M. 2019. Symbiont-mediated defense against Legionella pneumophila in amoebae. mBio 10:e00333–19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00333-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Collingro A, Tischler P, Weinmaier T, Penz T, Heinz E, Brunham RC, Read TD, Bavoil PM, Sachse K, Kahane S, Friedman MG, Rattei T, Myers GSA, Horn M. 2011. Unity in variety: the pan-genome of the Chlamydiae. Mol Biol Evol 28:3253–3270. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lagkouvardos I, Shen J, Horn M. 2014. Improved axenization method reveals complexity of symbiotic associations between bacteria and acanthamoebae. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:383–388. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jensen T, Barnes WG, Meyers D. 1970. Axenic cultivation of large populations of Acanthamoeba castellanii (JBM). J Parasitol 56:904–906. doi: 10.2307/3277503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Toenshoff ER, Kvellestad A, Mitchell SO, Steinum T, Falk K, Colquhoun DJ, Horn M. 2012. A novel betaproteobacterial agent of gill epitheliocystis in seawater farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). PLoS One 7:e32696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou J, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM. 1996. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:316–322. doi: 10.1128/AEM.62.2.316-322.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  • 12.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weinmaier T, Platzer A, Frank J, Hellinger H-J, Tischler P, Rattei T. 2016. ConsPred: a rule-based (re-)annotation framework for prokaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 32:3327–3329. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yamaguchi H, Matsuo J, Yamazaki T, Ishida K, Yagita K. 2015. Draft genome sequence of high-temperature-adapted Protochlamydia sp. HS-T3, an amoebal endosymbiotic bacterium found in Acanthamoeba isolated from a hot spring in Japan. Genome Announc 332:e01507-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01507-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sampo A, Matsuo J, Yamane C, Yagita K, Nakamura S, Shouji N, Hayashi Y, Yamazaki T, Yoshida M, Kobayashi M, Ishida K, Yamaguchi H. 2014. High-temperature adapted primitive Protochlamydia found in Acanthamoeba isolated from a hot spring can grow in immortalized human epithelial HEp-2 cells. Environ Microbiol 16:486–497. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pillonel T, Bertelli C, Greub G. 2018. Environmental metagenomic assemblies reveal seven new highly divergent chlamydial lineages and hallmarks of a conserved intracellular lifestyle. Front Microbiol 9:79. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Emms DM, Kelly S. 2015. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol 16:157. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Domman D, Collingro A, Lagkouvardos I, Gehre L, Weinmaier T, Rattei T, Subtil A, Horn M. 2014. Massive expansion of ubiquitination-related gene families within the Chlamydiae. Mol Biol Evol 31:2890–2904. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The draft genome sequences of the two chlamydial symbionts have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers VKHO00000000 and VJOT00000000. Reads are available at the SRA database under the accession numbers PRJNA492197 and PRJNA489593. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES