Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 29;19:1533033820916191. doi: 10.1177/1533033820916191

Table 3.

Studies on Predicting Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

First Author, Year Study Design Number of Patients MRI Modality Magnetic Field Radiomics Features Studies Directions Outcomes
Kirsi Holli-Helenius et al (2017)22 Not mentioned 27 DCE-MRI, DWI-MRI 1.5 T Texture features To assist in differentiating estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer molecular subtypes. The 2 most discriminative texture parameters to differentiate luminal A and luminal B subtypes were sum entropy and sum variance (P = .003). The AUCs were 0.828 for sum entropy (P = .004), 0.833 for sum variance (P = .003), and 0.878 for the model combining texture features sum entropy, sum variance (P = .001).
Fan et al, (2018)23 Retrospective 77 DCE-MRI 3.0 T Texture features (GLCM) To predict the Ki-67 status of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that features from the tumor subregions associated with early TTP yielded the highest performance (AUC = 0.807) among the subregions for predicting the Ki-67 status.
Fan et al (2017)24 Retrospective 60 DCE-MRI 1.5 T First-order statistics, texture features. Prediction of the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. The predictive model discriminated among the luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and basal-like subtypes, with AUC values of 0.867, 0.786, 0.888, and 0.923.
Fan et al (2019)25 Retrospective 211 DCE-MRI 3.0 T Texture features To predict the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. The tumor subregion related to fast-flow kinetics showed the best performance among the subregions for differentiating between patients with 4 molecular subtypes (AUC = 0.832).
Grimm et al (2015)26 Retrospective 275 T1WI, T2-FS 1.5 T/3.0 T Size, shape, gradient, texture, and dynamic features. To characterize the relationship between breast MRI and molecular subtype. The imaging features were associated with both luminal A and luminal B molecular subtypes. No association was found for either HER2 or basal molecular subtype and the imaging features.
Juan et al (2018)27 Retrospective 159 DCE-MRI 3.0 T Morphological features, gray-scale histograms and texture features. To investigate the association between Ki-67 expression and radiomics features in patients with invasive breast cancer. One morphology metric (area), 3 gray-scale histogram indexes (standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis) and 3 texture features (contrast, homogeneity and inverse differential moment) demonstrated a significant difference.
Ko et al (2016)28 Not mentioned 75 DCE-MRI 1.5 T Texture features. To investigate whether texture analysis of magnetic resonance images correlates with histopathological findings High histologic grades showed increased uniformity and decreased entropy on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted subtraction images, whereas the opposite tendency was observed on T2-weighted images.
Liang et al (2018)29 Retrospective 318 T2WI, T1 + C 1.5 T Intensity, shape, texture, and wavelet features. To predict the Ki-67 status in patients with breast cancer. The T2WI-based radiomics classifier exhibited good discrimination for Ki-67 status, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.762 (95% CI: 0.685-0.838) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.645-0.836) in the training and validation data sets.
Ma et al (2018)30 Retrospective 377 DCE-MRI 3.0 T Morphological, gray scale statistic, and texture features, To investigate whether quantitative radiomics features are associated with Ki67 expression of breast cancer. The model that used naive Bayes classification method achieved the best performance than the other 2 methods, yielding 0.773 AUC, 0.757 accuracy, 0.777 sensitivity, and 0.769 specificity.
Monti et al (2018)31 Not mentioned 49 DCE-MRI 3.0 T Shape features To build predictive models for the discrimination of molecular receptor status (ER+/ER−, PR+/PR−, and HER2+/HER2−), TN/nontriple negative (NTN), ki67 levels, and tumor grade. The predictive model coefficients were computed for each classification task. The AUC values obtained were 0.826 ± 0.006 for ER+/ER−, 0.875 ± 0.009 for PR+/PR−, 0.838 ± 0.006 for HER2+/HER2-, 0.876 ± 0.007 for TN/NTN, 0.811 ± 0.005 for ki67 + /ki67−, and 0.895 ± 0.006 for low grade/high grade.
Saha et al (2018)32 Not mentioned 922 DCE-MRI 1.5 T/3.0 T Texture features To investigate features published in the literature as well as those developed in laboratory to find the association between molecular subtype and features. Multivariate models were predictive of luminal A subtype with AUC = 0.697, triple-negative breast cancer with AUC = 0.654, ER status with AUC = 0.649 (95% CI: 0.591-0.705).
Sun et al (2018)33 Retrospective 107 Axial fast spin echo (FSE) T1WI, T2WI- FS, DWI 1.5 T/3.0 T Texture features To investigate the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. The differentiation accuracies of Fisher discriminant analysis on the enhanced high-resolution T1WI were 82.8% and 86.4% for 1.5 T and 3.0 T imaging. Fisher discriminant analysis on DWI texture features were achieved with a classification ability of 73.4% and 88.6%. The combined discriminant results for 2 kinds of magnetic resonance images were 95.0%, 97.7% in 1.5 T, and 3.0 T imaging, respectively.
Wang et al (2015)34 Not mentioned 88 DCE-MRI 3.0 T Morphologic, densitometric, and statistical texture measures of enhancement To determine the added discriminative value of detailed quantitative characterization of background parenchymal enhancement in addition to the tumor itself on DCE-MRI in identifying TN breast cancer. Imaging features based on the tumor region achieved an AUC of 0.782 in differentiating triple-negative cancers from others, in line with the current state of the art. When background parenchymal enhancement features were included, the AUC increased significantly to 0.878 (P < .01).
Xie et al (2019)35 retrospective 134 DCE-MRI, DWI-MRI 3.0 T Histogram analysis To identify TN breast cancer imaging biomarkers in comparison to other molecular subtypes using multiparametric MR imaging maps and whole tumor histogram analysis. The significant parameters on the univariate analysis achieved an AUC of 0.710 with a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 73.1% at the best cutoff point for differentiating TN cancers from luminal A cancer. An AUC of 0.763 (95% CI: 0.608-0.917) with a sensitivity of 86.4% and a specificity of 72.2% was achieved for differentiating TN cancers from HER2 positive cancers. Also, an AUC of 0.683 with a sensitivity of 54.5% and a specificity of 83.9% was achieved for differentiating TN cancers from non-TN cancers.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; DCE, dynamic contrast-enhanced; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; ER+, positive estrogen receptor; ER−, negative estrogen receptor; GLCM, gray-level co-occurrence matrix; HER-2+, positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HER-2+, negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PR+, positive progesterone receptor; PR−, negative progesterone receptor; T2-FS, T2-weighted fat suppression; T2WI, T2-weighted image; TN, triple negative; TTP, time to peak.