. 2020 Mar 25;10(4):193. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10040193

Table 5.

Morphometric analysis of the molecular cell layer thickness at three different areas of the cerebellar folia.

Groups	Mean ± SD	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups		Mean ± SD	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups		Mean ± SD	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups
Groups	At the Folium Surface	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups		Facing the Fissure	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups		At the Fissure Base	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups
Control	83.15± 5.77	ARS	p < 0.0020	125.0 ± 5.49	ARS	p < 0.0043	131.18 ± 5.99	ARS	p < 0.0005
		Cef.	p < 0.9679		Cef.	p < 0.6151		Cef.	p < 0.8693
		ARS+Cef	p < 0.4147		ARS+Cef	p < 0.2207		ARS+Cef	p < 0.1152
ARS	98.74± 7.17	Control	p < 0.0020	138.28 ± 6.90	Control	p < 0.0043	147.88 ± 5.55	Control	p < 0.0005
		Cef.	p < 0.0019		Cef.	p < 0.0110		Cef.	p < 0.0003
		ARS+Cef	p < 0.0116		ARS+Cef	p < 0.0298		ARS+Cef	p < 0.0060
Cef.	83.28± 5.57	Control	p < 0.9679	126.76 ± 5.87	Control	p < 0.6151	130.62 ± 5.42	Control	p < 0.8693
		ARS	p < 0.0019		ARS	p < 0.0110		ARS	p < 0.0003
		ARS+Cef	p < 0.4280		ARS+Cef	p < 0.4755		ARS+Cef	p < 0.1160
ARS + Ceftriaxone	86.26± 6.85	Control	p < 0.4147	129.18 ± 5.46	Control	p < 0.2207	136.88 ± 5.44	Control	p < 0.1152
		ARS	p < 0.0116		ARS	p < 0.0298		ARS	p < 0.0060
		Ceftriaxone	p < 0.4280		Ceftriaxone	p < 0.4755		Ceftriaxone	p < 0.1160