. 2020 Mar 25;10(4):193. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10040193

Table 6.

Morphometric analysis of the granular cell layer thickness at three different areas of the cerebellar folia.

Groups	Mean ± SD	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups		Mean ± SD	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups		Mean ± SD	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups
Groups	At the Folium Surface	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups		Facing the Fissure	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups		At the Fissure Base	Pairwise Comparisons with Other Groups
Control	122.67± 4.73	ARS	p < 0.0002	99.20± 5.87	ARS	p < 0.0004	73.20± 5.93	ARS	p < 0.0005
		Cef.	p < 0.8941		Cef.	p < 0.7739		Cef.	p < 0.9376
		ARS+Cef	p < 0.3302		ARS+Cef	p < 0.2117		ARS+Cef	p < 0.2181
ARS	104.21± 6.28	Control	p < 0.0002	82.20± 5.37	Control	p < 0.0004	54.18± 7.14	Control	p < 0.0005
		Cef.	p < 0.0001		Cef.	p < 0.0001		Cef.	p < 0.0002
		ARS+Cef	p < 0.0009		ARS+Cef	p < 0.0044		ARS+Cef	p < 0.0046
Cef.	123.01± 3.85	Control	p < 0.8941	98.36± 3.68	Control	p < 0.7739	73.44± 4.29	Control	p < 0.9376
		ARS	p < 0.0001		ARS	p < 0.0001		ARS	p < 0.0002
		ARS+Cef	p < 0.2434		ARS+Cef	p < 0.2242		ARS+Cef	p < 0.1499
ARS+ Cef	119.72± 5.25	Control	p < 0.3302	94.52± 6.27	Control	p < 0.2117	68.48± 6.50	Control	p < 0.2181
		ARS	p < 0.0009		ARS	p < 0.0044		ARS	p < 0.0046
		Cef.	p < 0.2434		Cef.	p < 0.2242		Cef.	p < 0.1499