Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;12(4):859. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040859

Table 4.

Relative sensitivity and specificity of urine pellet and supernatant for bladder cancer diagnosis, as compared to full void. New cut-offs were determined for urine pellet and supernatant; optimal cut-offs from our previous study were used for full void [6].

Markers Pellet Supernatant
Relative Sens: Pellet vs. Full Void (95% CI) Relative Spec: Pellet vs. Full Void (95% CI) Relative Sens: Supernatant vs. Full Void (95% CI) Relative Spec: Supernatant vs. Full Void (95% CI)
FAM19A4 1.00 * 1.00 * 1.00 * 1.00 *
GHSR 1.60 (0.94–2.74) 1.00 * 1.40 (0.88–2.24) 1.00 *
MAL 1.50 (0.95–2.38) 0.92 (0.77–1.09) 1.17 (0.86–1.58) 1.00 *
miR-129 1.75 (0.92–3.32) 1.00 * 1.50 (0.85–2.64) 1.00 *
miR-935 2.67 (1.09–6.52) 0.92 (0.77–1.09) 1.33 (0.76–2.35) 1.00 *
PHACTR3 1.50 (0.85–2.64) 0.83 (0.65–1.07) 1.50 (0.85–2.64) 0.92 (0.77–1.09)
PRDM14 1.33 (0.89–1.99) 1.00 * 1.00 * 1.00 *
SST 1.00 * 1.00 * 1.50 (0.95–2.38) 0.83 (0.65–1.07)
ZIC1 1.00 * 1.00 * 1.00 * 1.00 *
Panel GHSR/MAL 1.43 (0.95–2.14) 0.92 (0.77–1.09) 1.00 * 1.00 *

* CI not estimable, since there was a perfect match in positive and negative outcomes between both fractions. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.