Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;12(4):785. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040785

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients (n = 227) with valid EGFR test results using two mutation tests.

Patient Demographics (Wild vs. Mutant) PANAMutyper Test Result cobas v2 Test Result
Wild Mutant p value Wild Mutant p Value
(n = 130) (n = 97) (n = 143) (n = 84)
Age a
Median y (range) 68 (44–85) 63 (35–83) p < 0.001 68 (44–85) 63 (35–83) p < 0.001
Sex b
Male 89 (39%) 36 (16%) p < 0.001 99 (44%) 26 (12%) p < 0.001
Female 41 (18%) 61 (27%) 44 (19%) 58 (26%)
Smoking history b
Never 57 (25%) 68 (30%) p < 0.001 61 (27%) 64 (28%) p < 0.001
Former 57 (25%) 24 (11%) 66 (29%) 15 (6.6%)
Current 16 (7.0%) 5 (2.2%) 16 (7.0%) 5 (2.2%)
Histology b
Adenocarcinoma 83 (37%) 91 (40%) p < 0.001 90 (40%) 84 (37%) p < 0.001
Squamous 45 (20%) 6 (2.6%) 51 (23%) 0
Large cell 2 (0.9%) 0 2 (0.9%) 0
TNM stage b,c
I 48 (21%) 33 (15%) p = 0.644 53 (23%) 28 (12%) p = 0.491
II 22 (9.7%) 9 (4.0%) 23 (10%) 8 (3.5%)
III 29 (13%) 11 (4.8%) 34 (15%) 6 (2.6%)
IV 31 (14%) 44 (19%) 33 (15%) 42 (19%)

a Independent t-test for EGFR wild vs. EGFR mutant groups diagnosed by the same assay. b Chi-square test for EGFR wild vs. EGFR mutant groups diagnosed by the same assay. c TNM stage was determined at the sample collection (TNM: cancer staging system; T: primary tumor; N: lymph node; M: distant metastasis).