Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;12(4):785. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040785

Table 2.

Concordance of two EGFR mutation tests in tumor tissue and plasma samples.

Test Results Tumor Tissue Plasma
(Reference: cobas v2) (n = 217) (n = 201)
Concordant Results
Both Wild 123 (57%) 165 (82%)
Both Mutant 75 (35%) 21 (10%)
E x19 del 17 (8.5%) 11 (5.5%)
L858R 14 (6.5%) 3 (1.4%)
T790M 1 (0.5%) 2 (1.0%)
L858R+T790M 30 (14%) 3 (1.5%)
Ex19 del+T790M 13 (6.0%) 2 (1.0%)
Discordant Result
P_Mutant/c_Wild a 14 (6.5%) 7 (3.5%)
c_Mutant/P_Wild b 1 (0.5%) 6 (3.0%)
Different Mutant 4 (1.8%) 2 (1.0%)
Test Evaluation
Sensitivity (PPA) c (95% CI) 94% (86%–97%) 72% (54%–85%)
Specificity (NPA) c (95% CI) 90% (84%–94%) 96% (92%–98%)
Accuracy (OPA) c (95% CI) 91% (87%–94%) 93% (88%–95%)
Kappa Coefficient (95% CI) 0.82 (0.74–0.92) 0.69 (0.54–0.84)

a P_Mutant/c_Wild: PANAMutyper result is mutant but cobas v2 result is wild; b c_Mutant/P_Wild: cobas v2 result is mutant but PANAMutyper result is wild; c Calculation with cobas v2 as reference; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; OPA, overall percentage agreement; PPA, positive percentage agreement; NPA, negative percentage agreement.