Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;146(7):1–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0662

Table 1. Studies Included in the Meta-analysis of Correlationsa.

Source Patient-related factors Postoperative speech recognition task Follow-up, mo
Beyea et al,28 2016 Age at CI, DoHL Sentences in quiet: HINT, AzBio ≥12
Derinsu et al,29 2018 Age at CI, DoHL, WR Words in quiet: phonetically balanced monosyllable word lists ≥12
Fabie et al,30 2018 PTA, WR Words in quiet: CNC ≥6
Sentences in quiet: AzBio in quiet
Sentences in noise: AzBio in noise
Francis et al,22 2005 Age at CI, DoHL, PTA Words in quiet: CNC 6
Guerra-Jimenez et al,24 2016 Age at CI, DoHL Words in quiet: NS ≥12
Holden et al,1 2013 Age at CI, DoHL Words in quiet: CNC ≥24
Holden et al,31 2016 Age at CI, DoHL, PTA Words in quiet: CNC ≥6
Sentences in quiet: AzBio in quiet
Sentences in noise: AzBio in noise
Kamakura et al,32 2016 Age at CI Words in quiet: CNC, NU-6 >12
Kim et al,21 2018 Age at CI, DoHL Words in quiet: NS 24
Li et al,33 2007 Age at CI Words in quiet: NU-6 or CNC ≥12
Medina et al,34 2017 DoHL Words in quiet: DWR 6
Sentences in quiet: NS
Plant et al,35 2016 DoHL Words in quiet: CNC 12
Rubinstein et al,36 1999 DoHL Words in quiet: NU-6 or CNC 9

Abbreviations: CI, cochlear implant; CNC, consonant-nucleus-consonant test; DoHL, duration of hearing loss; DWR, disyllabic word recognition; HINT, Hearing in Noise Test; NS, not specified; NU-6, Northwestern University Auditory Test Number 6; PTA, preimplant earphone pure-tone average; WR, preimplant-aided word recognition.

a

Studies listed satisfied inclusion criteria for meta-analysis of correlations, factors analyzed, speech recognition measure used, and follow-up time in months.