Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 4;12(4):881. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040881

Table 4.

MMP3 and/or CCN2/CTGF expression correlated with the prognosis of cancer patients.

Tumor Region MMP3 CCN2/CTGF Correlation
Lung p = 0.035 * p = 0.05 * MMP3-high, CTGF-high; poor prognosis
Head & Neck p = 0.051 p = 0.018 * MMP3-high, CTGF-high; poor prognosis
Melanoma p = 0.071 p = 0.17 MMP3-high, CTGF-high; poor prognosis
Glioma p = 0.35 p = 0.13 MMP3-high, CTGF-high; poor prognosis
Pancreatic p = 0.00041 **** p = 0.24 MMP3-high; poor prognosis
Cervical p = 0.00097 **** p = 0.14 MMP3-high; poor prognosis
Prostate p = 0.033 * p = 0.21 MMP3-high; poor prognosis
Stomach p = 0.32 p = 0.0005 **** CTGF-high; poor prognosis
Urothelial p = 0.23 p = 0.0038 *** CTGF-high; poor prognosis
Colorectal p = 0.0016 *** p = 0.044 * CTGF-high; poor prognosis
Breast p = 0.23 p = 0.29 CTGF-high; poor prognosis
Endometrial p = 0.0051 ** p = 0.057 MMP3-high, CTGF-high; better prognosis

The data were expressed as a log-rank test p-value. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001. Expression levels in each case were shown in Figure 8. Kaplan–Meier plots are shown in Figure 9.