Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 8;12(4):906. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040906

Table 1.

Relations between the presence of hybrid E/M cancer cells and clinicopathological variables.

Variable Category E/M score > 2% p-Value 1
T Ta–T1 (n = 48) 6 (13%) <10−6
T2–T4 (n = 65) 38 (58%)
N N0 (n = 92) 32 (35%) 0.08
N+ (n = 31) 12 (57%)
M M0 (n = 108) 41 (38%) 0.38
M1 (n = 5) 3 (60%)
Stage 0–I (n = 48) 6 (13%) <10−6
II–IV (n = 65) 38 (58%)
Grade low (n = 25) 1 (4%) 0.00002
high (n = 88) 43 (49%)
Divergent differentiation no (n = 88) 29 (33%) 0.02
yes (n = 25) 15 (60%)
CIS 2 no (n = 83) 27 (33%) 0.03
yes (n = 30) 17 (57%)
Multifocality no (n = 91) 40 (44%) 0.03
yes (n = 22) 4 (18%)
LVI 3 no (n = 72) 24 (33%) 0.11
yes (n = 41) 20 (49%)

1 Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test; 2 concomitant in situ carcinoma; 3 lymphovascular invasion.