Table 1.
GRADE | Explanation | Definition strength of recommendation | Definition quality of evidence |
---|---|---|---|
1A | Strong recommendation High quality of evidence |
Benefits clearly outweigh risks and burdens, or vice versa | Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect |
1B | Strong recommendation Moderate quality of evidence |
Benefits clearly outweigh risks and burdens, or vice versa | Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate |
1C | Strong recommendation Low quality of evidence |
Benefits clearly outweigh risks and burdens, or vice versa | Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate |
1D | Strong recommendation Very low quality of evidence |
Benefits clearly outweigh risks and burdens, or vice versa | Any estimate of effect is very uncertain |
2A | Weak recommendation High quality of evidence |
Trade-offs between benefits and risks and burdens are closely balanced | Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect |
2B | Weak recommendation Moderate quality of evidence |
Trade-offs between benefits and risks and burdens are closely balanced | Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate |
2C | Weak recommendation Low quality of evidence |
Trade-offs between benefits and risks and burdens are closely balanced | Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate |
2D | Weak recommendation Very low quality of evidence |
Trade-offs between benefits and risks and burdens are closely balanced | Any estimate of effect is very uncertain |