Table 4.
serial evaluation of participants’ confidence about core competency (CC) education (n = 28 in each group)
| Questions | regular FD module participants | intervention FD module participants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I feel confident about … … | pre- module |
end-of-module (Δ% from pre-module) | Follow-up (Δ% from pre-module) | pre- module |
end-of-module (Δ% from pre-module) | Follow-up (Δ% from pre-module) |
| 1. delivering CC-based teachings | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 3.9 ± 0.4 (26%) | 3.8 ± 0.3 (23%) | 3.4 ± 0.2 |
4.8 ± 0.3 (41%)* #2.3 |
4.7 ± 0.5 (38%)* #3 |
| 2. delivering CC-based assessments | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.7 (14%) | 3 ± 0.6 (3%) | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.2 (19%) |
3.9 ± 0.5 (26%)* #1.5 |
| 3.designing CC-based teachings | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.4 (27%) | 2.7 ± 0.3 (23%) | 2.7 ± 0.8 | 3.4 ± 0.3 (26%) |
3.8 ± 0.2 (41%)* #3.67 |
| 4.designing CC-based assessments | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.5 (26%) | 3.1 ± 0.2 (35%) | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 3.6 ± 0.3 (29%) |
4.1 ± 0.4 (46%)* #2.4 |
| 5.leading CC-based teachings | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.2 (29%) | 3.4 ± 0.6 (42%) | 2.5 ± 0.7 |
4.0 ± 0.5 (60%)* #4.5 |
4.1 ± 0.3 (64%)* #1.17 |
| 6 leading CC-based assessments | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.4 (37%) | 2.4 ± 0.2 (26%) | 2.3 ± 0.5 |
3.8 ± 0.5 (65%)* #3 |
3.9 ± 0.2 (70%)* #7.5 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD; agreement to questions are rated by 5-point Likert scale; 5 = very agree; 3 = neutral; 1 = very not agree; *, p < 0.05 vs. corresponding data of regular FD group that analyzed using student t test; Comparison among data of multiple time points were analyzed with ANOVA test; # t-test’s effect size for compared data between groups that with significance on t test