Table 6.
The power analysis of significant parameters in Tables 3, 4 and 5 between regular and intervention FD modules by self-reported participants’ familiarity, confidence and sustainability for core competency (CC) education after training
| Significant parameters | Data of end-of-module stage | Data of follow-up stage |
|---|---|---|
| I am familiar with delivering CC-based teaching- Teaching clinics | 60.7% | 100% |
| I am familiar with delivering CC-based assessment- Case-based discussion (CBD) | 100% | 99.9% |
| I am familiar with delivering CC-based assessment-mini-CEX | 99.2% | 99.9% |
| I am familiar with delivering CC-based assessment- OSCE | 100% | 100% |
| I am familiar with designing CC-based teaching and assessments | 100% | 100% |
| I am familiar with leading CC-based teaching and assessments | 100% | 100% |
| I feel confident in delivering CC-based teachings | 100% | 100% |
| I feel confident in leading CC-based teachings and assessments | 100% | 100% |
| I am sustainably involve in designing and leading CC-based education within 1 year | 100% | 100% |
| I am sustainably incorporate CC in leading courses within 1 year | 100% | 100% |