Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;20:148. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-02934-3

Table 3.

Participants’ observed competence in performing specific yoga postures at 12 weeks, based on expert evaluation

Percentage of participants receiving each competency rating for each posturea
Posture Not at all successful [1] Slightly successful [2] Moderately successful [3] Very successful [4] Extremely successful [5] Mean competency ratingb
(SD)
Tadasana (mountain pose) 0% 0% 0% 47.8% 52.2%

4.5

(0.5)

Utkatasana (chair pose) 0% 0% 4.4% 47.8% 47.8%

4.4

(0.6)

Trikonasana (triangle pose) 0% 4.4% 69.6% 17.4% 8.7%

3.3

(0.7)

Virabhadrasana 2 (warrior 2 pose) 0% 4.4% 39.1% 30.4% 26.1%

3.8

(0.9)

Parsvottanasana (intense side stretch pose) 0% 4.4% 0% 65.2% 30.4%

4.2

(0.7)

Malasana (garland/squat pose) 4.6% 0% 9.1% 27.3% 59.1%

4.4

(1.0)

Bharadvajasana (seated twist pose) 0% 0% 21.7% 30.4% 47.8%

4.3

(0.8)

Vajrasana 0% 0% 34.8% 13.0% 52.2%

4.2

(0.9)

Baddha Konasana (bound angle pose) 0% 0% 22.7% 18.2% 59.1%

4.4

(0.8)

Shalabhasana (locust pose) 5.0% 0% 0% 30.0% 65.0%

4.5

(0.6)

Salamba setubandhasana (supported bridge pose) 5.0% 0% 0% 30.0% 65.0%

3.9

(1.0)

Supta padangusthasana (reclined hand to big toe pose) 0% 0% 4.4% 34.8% 60.9%

4.6

(0.6)

Supta baddha konasana (reclined bound angle pose) 0% 0% 0% 52.2% 47.8%

4.5

(0.5)

Viparita karani variation (inverted lake pose) 0% 0% 12.5% 31.3% 56.3%

4.4

(0.7)

Savasana (corpse pose) 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

5.0

(0)

Percentages are column percentages

a4 (14.8%) women did not have expert observation at all, 13 (48%) had data on all postures, remaining women were missing between 1 and 3 postures

bCalculated by taking the average of all participant competency ratings for each posture, based on a scale of 1 (not at all successful) to 5 (extremely successful