Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;20:701. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08851-x

Table 3.

HBM factors for predicting favorable oral health behaviors

B SE Wald statistics OR (95% CI) P

Predicting brushing twice daily (N = 412, Cox & Snell R2 = 0.097, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.160)

Chi-square = 42.2, df = 6, p < 0.001

Perceived susceptibility −0.16 0.17 0.91 0.85 (0.61–1.19) 0.34
Perceived benefits 0.14 0.25 0.31 1.14 (0.71–1.86) 0.58
Perceived barriers −0.10 0.25 0.16 0.91 (0.56–1.47) 0.69
Cues to action 0.21 0.18 1.43 1.23 (0.88–1.74) 1.23
Perceived severity 0.14 0.20 0.48 1.15 (0.78–1.69) 0.49
Self-efficacy 0.86 0.17 25.98 2.36 (1.70–3.28) < 0.001

Predicting weekly flossing behavior (N = 418, Cox & Snell R2 = 0.069, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.106)

Chi-square = 30.0, df = 6, p < 0.001

Perceived susceptibility −0.30 0.14 4.42 0.74 (0.56–0.98) 0.04
Perceived benefits −0.01 0.22 0.001 0.99 (0.65–1.53) 0.98
Perceived barriers −0.86 0.24 12.74 0.42 (0.26–0.68) < 0.001
Cues to action 0.31 0.14 5.26 1.36 (1.05–1.77) 0.02
Perceived severity −0.10 0.17 0.37 0.90 (0.65–1.26) 0.54
Self-efficacy −0.02 1.14 0.01 0.98 (0.75–1.29) 0.91

Predicting regular dental visit (N = 419, Cox & Snell R2 = 0.070, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.098)

Chi-square = 30.6, df = 6, p < 0.001

Perceived susceptibility 0.09 0.13 0.53 1.10 (0.86–1.41) 0.47
Perceived benefits −0.21 0.19 1.15 0.81 (0.56–1.19) 0.28
Perceived barriers −1.10 0.22 26.14 0.33 (0.22–0.51) < 0.001
Cues to action 0.08 0.12 0.37 1.08 (0.85–1.37) 0.54
Perceived severity −0.23 0.15 2.25 0.80 (0.59–1.07) 0.13
Self-efficacy −0.16 0.12 1.71 0.85 (0.67–1.08) 0.19