Table 3.
B | SE | Wald statistics | OR (95% CI) | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predicting brushing twice daily (N = 412, Cox & Snell R2 = 0.097, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.160) Chi-square = 42.2, df = 6, p < 0.001 | |||||
Perceived susceptibility | −0.16 | 0.17 | 0.91 | 0.85 (0.61–1.19) | 0.34 |
Perceived benefits | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 1.14 (0.71–1.86) | 0.58 |
Perceived barriers | −0.10 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.91 (0.56–1.47) | 0.69 |
Cues to action | 0.21 | 0.18 | 1.43 | 1.23 (0.88–1.74) | 1.23 |
Perceived severity | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.48 | 1.15 (0.78–1.69) | 0.49 |
Self-efficacy | 0.86 | 0.17 | 25.98 | 2.36 (1.70–3.28) | < 0.001 |
Predicting weekly flossing behavior (N = 418, Cox & Snell R2 = 0.069, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.106) Chi-square = 30.0, df = 6, p < 0.001 | |||||
Perceived susceptibility | −0.30 | 0.14 | 4.42 | 0.74 (0.56–0.98) | 0.04 |
Perceived benefits | −0.01 | 0.22 | 0.001 | 0.99 (0.65–1.53) | 0.98 |
Perceived barriers | −0.86 | 0.24 | 12.74 | 0.42 (0.26–0.68) | < 0.001 |
Cues to action | 0.31 | 0.14 | 5.26 | 1.36 (1.05–1.77) | 0.02 |
Perceived severity | −0.10 | 0.17 | 0.37 | 0.90 (0.65–1.26) | 0.54 |
Self-efficacy | −0.02 | 1.14 | 0.01 | 0.98 (0.75–1.29) | 0.91 |
Predicting regular dental visit (N = 419, Cox & Snell R2 = 0.070, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.098) Chi-square = 30.6, df = 6, p < 0.001 | |||||
Perceived susceptibility | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.53 | 1.10 (0.86–1.41) | 0.47 |
Perceived benefits | −0.21 | 0.19 | 1.15 | 0.81 (0.56–1.19) | 0.28 |
Perceived barriers | −1.10 | 0.22 | 26.14 | 0.33 (0.22–0.51) | < 0.001 |
Cues to action | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.37 | 1.08 (0.85–1.37) | 0.54 |
Perceived severity | −0.23 | 0.15 | 2.25 | 0.80 (0.59–1.07) | 0.13 |
Self-efficacy | −0.16 | 0.12 | 1.71 | 0.85 (0.67–1.08) | 0.19 |