Table 3.
Findings on personal-level risk factors, including behavioral, interpersonal, and psychosocial factors
| Author Year Country | Time in bar work | Sex work and type of clients | HIV risk awareness and willingness to test | Condom use | HIV risk magnifiers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nagot 2002 Burkina Faso [9] |
Median of 6 years, with wide range | Mean of 3.3 clients per week | Self-assessment of acquiring HIV in the future. Yes: 31%; No: 31%; Don’t know: 37% | 12% of sex acts condomless | – |
|
Van Blerk 2007 Ethiopia [24] |
Timespan worked in bars often short | SW venue: back rooms of bars; Mean of 1 client per night most nights | High HIV risk awareness | High condom use with clients almost never with boyfriends | Alcohol consumption among FBWs lowers their control over condom negotiation |
|
Van Blerk 2008 Ethiopia [23] |
– | – |
High risk awareness but feeling powerless to insist on condom use Many afraid to test for HIV |
Forced condomless sex or condom cutting common | Several reports of client violence against FBWs |
|
Van Blerk 2011 Ethiopia [25] |
– | SW venue: varies by bar: luxury hotel rooms to backrooms and corridors; Regular clients can become boyfriends | Forced condomless sex, sometimes cutting of condoms | Expected to drink alcohol; Socially isolated if friends & family know occupation | |
|
Sori 2012 Ethiopia [3] |
Mean of several years; Frequent bar changes | Expectation that low/no wages supplemented by SW; SW venue: back room of bars | Condom use occasional with new clients, rare for regulars | ||
| Messersmith 2014 Ghana [6] | – | Few admitted doing transactional sex; widespread agreement that sex work is done by FBW |
High HIV knowledge; 64% FBWs think they are at risk of HIV, most due to partner infidelity 64% had ever tested for HIV |
– | Low levels of alcohol use reported; client alcohol use seen as risky; violence largely IPV, not at bars |
|
Kishindo 1995a Malawi [26] |
Mean 3 years | Expected to make money from SW not BW; mean of 11 clients per week; SW venue: back rooms of bars | Low HIV risk awareness | 23% lifetime condom use |
Willing to not use condoms with clients if enough money paid Stigmatized because they are perceived to spread HIV |
|
Kishindo 1995b Malawi [8] |
All consider BW a temporary occupation; | SW venue: in back room, or elsewhere post- shift; 40% report regular clients. | High awareness that multiple partners risky; low HIV risk self-perception | 30% lifetime condom use | – |
|
Mhalu 1991 Tanzania [27] |
– | – | – | Unmarried and longer term FBWs with access to counseling had condom use rates of around 65% | – |
|
Mnyika 1995 Tanzania [28] |
– | 92% of FBWs are aware of the importance of condom use | – | 47% lifetime condom use; 44% always have condoms available; 28% regularly insist on condom use with clients | – |
|
Talle 1995 Tanzania [7] |
– | All FBWs engage in SW; often have clients & boyfriends | High awareness, low perceived self-risk for HIV | Condom use rare |
Reports of violence if refuse client’s demanded sexual practices Asking clients to use condoms raises stigma |
|
Talle 1998 Tanzania [10] |
All working in Namanga < 1 year | Number of clients answered imprecisely & perhaps underreported | – | – | – |
|
Mgalla 1997 Tanzania [29] |
– | Almost all have both casual & regular clients | High but imperfect HIV awareness | Some condom use with casual clients, none with regulars; | Low negotiation power |
|
Riedner 2003 Tanzania [30] |
– | 75% of FBWs´ relationships involve money | – | Condom use ~ 50% ever with both, regular & casual partners | – |
|
Akarro 2009 Tanzania [1] |
– | – | High HIV risk awareness | 90% report more money for condomless sex | 96.7% regularly drink alcohol |
|
Beckham 2013 Tanzania [31] |
– | – |
High HIV risk awareness Reports of FBWs unveiling their occupation in front of doctors to receive appropriate care |
Condom decisions often left to client; condomless sex better paid | Stigmatized if reveal their profession to HCW; often assumed HIV-positive & referred to ART clinic |
|
Ostermannn 2015 Tanzania [32] |
– | FBWs have twice as many lifetime sexual partners as non-FBW peers | FBWs willing to test for HIV when tests are required by officials | – | FBWs less willing than others use home-based HIV testing, more concern re. disclosure |
|
Gysels 2002 Uganda [2] |
– |
Women have both casual & regular clients Some claim to enjoy work: can make money & avoid demands for sex from local men; some do well through SW, others still struggling |
High HIV risk awareness | Condom use acceptable with casual, but taboo for regular clients | Alcohol use leads to rape; 82% have been subject to violence, 44% to forced sex. Majority of rape prior to starting bar work |
|
Ntozi 2003 Uganda [33] |
– | Both types of casual & regular clients; prefer casual because they pay higher and mostly cash |
High HIV risk awareness High stated willingness to test for HIV, but no past testing Barriers to HIV testing: cost & no facility |
Increased condom use in recent years | Alcohol claimed as reason for multiple partners & low condom use |