Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;15:175. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01694-7

Table 2.

Quality assessment of included studies

Study Selection Comparability Exposure/outcome Total
Feagin et al. [18] 3 2 3 8
Fisher et al. [19] 2 2 3 7
Wasilewski et al. [20] 2 2 3 7
Dandy et al. [21] 2 2 3 7
Wachtl et al. [22] 2 2 3 7
Cosgarea et al. [23] 3 2 3 8
Kao et al. [24] 2 2 3 7
Orfaly et al. [25] 3 2 2 7
Meighan et al. [26] 3 2 3 8
Millett et al. [27] 2 2 3 7
Nicholas et al. [28] 2 2 3 7
Prodromos et al. [29] 3 2 3 8
Robertson et al. [8] 3 2 3 8
Nwachukwu et al. [6] 3 2 3 8
Demirağ et al. [30] 3 2 3 8
Kiekara et al. [31] 3 2 3 8
Hettrich et al. [32] 3 2 3 8
Csintalan et al. [33] 3 2 3 8
Cruz et al. [34] 3 2 3 8
Werner et al. [35] 3 2 3 8
Cancienne et al. [36] 3 2 3 8
Sanders et al. [9] 3 2 2 7
Ding et al. [37] 3 2 3 8
Meister et al. [38] 2 2 3 7
Bordes et al. [39] 3 2 2 7
Runner et al. [40] 3 2 3 8
Su et al. [41] 3 2 3 8
Huleatt et al. [12] 3 2 3 8
Osti et al. [42] 3 2 3 8
Westermann et al. [43] 3 2 3 8
Patel et al. [44] 3 2 3 8
Cruz et al. [45] 3 2 2 7
Offerhaus et al. [46] 3 2 3 8
Panisset et al. [47] 2 2 3 7
Romain et al., 2019 3 2 3 8
Rushdi et al. [15] 3 2 3 8
Grassi et al. [48] 3 2 3 8