Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 14;16(3):687–692. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1666612

Table 3.

Comparison of the GMT of anti-HBs 1 month and 8 years later with different schedules.

Group N GMT1 (95% CI) (mIU/mL) F# P N GMT2 (95% CI) (mIU/mL) F# P
Group I 241 51.29 (38.02–67.61) 55.26 <0.001 104 22.91 (14.45–36.31) 3.61 0.029
Group II 290 165.96 (125.89–218.78)a     45 16.98 (8.51–33.88)    
Group III 240 478.63 (354.81–630.96)ab     93 8.91 (5.25–15.49)a    

N, Total number; GMT, the geometric mean titer of anti-HBs; GMT 1, GMT 1 month later; GMT 2, GMT 8 years later.

#The one-way analysis of variance was used to compare the GMT among the three groups and the leastsignificant difference (LSD) was used for multiple comparisons.

aP < 0.05, compared with Group I.

bP < 0.05, compared with Group II