Table 4.
Comparison of method performance characteristics with the literature reported methods for PFOS and PFOA.
| Reference | Preparation Method | Sample volume (mL) | PFOS | PFOA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOD (ng/L) | LOQ (ng/L) | LOD (ng/L) | LOQ (ng/L) | |||
| Current Study | SPE (HLB) + (WAX) | 10 | 1.9* | 2.5* | ||
| [33] | SPE (PreSep C Agri) | 1000 | 0.025–0.05 | 0.05–0.1 | ||
| [15] | SPE (PreSep C Agri) | 1000 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.1 |
| [17] | SPE (HLB) | 1000 | 1 | 5 | ||
| [21] | SPE (Sep-Pak Plus PS-2) | 1000 | 0.5 | 0.7 | ||
| [14] | SPE (WAX) | 1000 | 0.13 | 0.66 | 0.13 | 0.5 |
| [24] | SPE (C8) | 500 | 0.024/0.052 | 0.091 | ||
| [34] | SPE (WAX) | 500 | 1.3 | 4 | 1.3 | 4 |
| [18] | SPE (WAX) | 250 | 0.2 | 0.8 | ||
| [32] | LLE | 200/1000 | 1 | 4.2 | ||
These values are determined using LCMRL procedure.