Table 2. Fatty acid content of experimental diets as determined by GLC.
Experimental Diet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON | ↑DHA | ↓SF.ω6 | ↓SF.ω6↑DHA | ||
Common Name | Chemical Formula | (% of total fatty acids, mean ± SD) | |||
Lauric | C12:0 | 0.65 ± 0.01A | 1.49 ± 0.03B | 0.14 ± 0.01C | 0.83 ± 0.01D |
Myristic | C14:0 | 2.87 ± 0.06A | 5.54 ± 0.05B | 0.53 ± 0.01C | 2.51 ± 0.02D |
Pentadecanoic | C15:0 | 0.29 ± 0.00A | 0.30 ± 0.00A | 0.07 ± 0.00B | 0.06 ± 0.00B |
Palmitic | C16:0 | 22.24 ± 0.16A | 22.63 ± 0.05B | 10.87 ± 0.06C | 11.00 ± 0.01C |
Palmitoleic | C16:1ω7 | 1.15 ± 0.03A | 1.46 ± 0.02B | 0.57 ± 0.02C | 0.84 ± 0.00D |
Stearic | C18:0 | 8.49± 0.04A | 8.26 ± 0.03B | 3.61 ± 0.03C | 3.37 ± 0.01D |
Oleic | C18:1ω9 | 39.19 ± 0.38A | 29.00 ± 0.08B | 72.63 ± 0.08C | 64.41 ± 0.03D |
Linoleic | C18:2ω6 | 21.07 ± 0.21A | 20.62 ± 0.18B | 8.57 ± 0.04C | 7.82 ± 0.04D |
Arachidic | C20:0 | 0.21 ± 0.03A | 0.17 ± 0.01A | 0.29 ± 0.00B | 0.28 ± 0.01B |
alpha-Linolenic | C18:3ω3 | 1.90 ± 0.03A | 1.81 ± 0.04B | 0.93 ± 0.01C | 0.87 ± 0.02C |
Behenic | C22:0 | 0.10 ± 0.01A | 0.11 ± 0.01A | 0.10 ± 0.01A | 0.11 ± 0.00A |
Lignoceric | C24:0 | 0.04 ± 0.01A | 0.05 ± 0.01A | 0.03 ± 0.00A | 0.05 ± 0.00A |
Eicosapentaenoic | C20:5ω3 | 0.00 ± 0.00A | 0.13 ± 0.00B | 0.00 ± 0.00A | 0.10 ± 0.01C |
Docosahexaenoic | C22:6ω3 | 0.00 ± 0.00A | 7.09 ± 0.20B | 0.00 ± 0.00A | 6.34 ± 0.08C |
Total SFA | 35.28 ± 0.21A | 38.84 ± 0.05B | 15.80 ± 0.08C | 18.39 ± 0.02D | |
Total MUFA | 41.74 ± 0.36A | 31.49 ± 0.10B | 74.70 ± 0.10C | 66.49 ± 0.01D | |
Total ω-3 PUFA | 1.90 ± 0.03A | 9.04 ± 0.19B | 0.93 ± 0.01C | 7.31 ± 0.05D | |
Total ω-6 PUFA | 21.07 ± 0.21A | 20.62 ± 0.18B | 8.57 ± 0.04C | 7.82 ± 0.04D | |
ω-6: ω-3 ratio | 11.07 ± 0.10A | 2.28 ± 0.07B | 9.24 ± 0.13C | 1.12 ± 0.01D |
Data presented as mean ± SD. Difference between diets compared by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Unique letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05)