. 2020 May 15;15(5):e0228479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228479

Table 7. Comparison of “iTerm-PseKNC” and “iterb-PPse”.

Dataset	Method	Sn	Sp	MCC	Acc
Benchmark dataset	iterb-PPse	0.9964	1	0.9991	0.9988
Benchmark dataset	iTerm-PseKNC	0.8545	0.9993	0.8846	0.9480
E. coli	iterb-PPse	0.9013	1	0.8898	0.9424
E. coli	iTerm-PseKNC	0.8879	0.9371	0.8166	0.9084
B. subtilis	iterb-PPse	0.9929	1	0.9844	0.9945
B. subtilis	iTerm-PseKNC	0.96	0.9836	0.9066	0.9653

The prediction results were obtained after 100 times 5-fold CV.