Skip to main content
. 2020 May;41(5):836–843. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6498

Table 3:

Comparison of carotid plaque morphologic and compositional characteristics between patients with and without ipsilateral ACI lesions

Mean ± SD. (No.) (%) or Median (25–75 Percentiles)
P Valuea
Patients with ACI (n = 40) Patients without ACI (n = 69)
Mean lumen area (mm2) 35.5 ± 13.5 36.5 ± 12.4 .555
Mean wall area (mm2) 48.3 ± 14.9 41.5 ± 11.1 .028
Mean total vessel area (mm2) 83.8 ± 20.6 78.0 ± 18.6 .172
Mean wall thickness (mm) 1.9 ± 0.6 1.6 ± 0.4 .010
Mean normalized wall index (%) 57.9 ± 11.3 53.6 ± 9.1 .087
Total luminal occlusion 21 (52.5%) 11 (15.9%) <.001
Plaque volume (mm2) 1240.7 ± 535.2 1064.4 ± 414.1 .159
Presence of calcification 33 (82.5) 60 (87.0) .526
Presence of FCR 14 (35.0) 23 (33.3) .859
Volume of calcification (mm3)b 35.8 (12.4–87.3) 36.2 (15.8–79.6) .794
Percentage calcification volume (%)b 3.1 (1.3–6.4) 3.5 (1.9–7.7) .312
Volume of LRNC (mm3)b 312.7 (174.1–625.3) 227.7 (122.1–351.4) .038
Percentage LRNC volume (%)b 29.4 (17.9–42.1) 23.6 (14.0–34.0) .039
Volume of IPH (mm3)b 93.2 (31.4–201.2) 56.4 (21.9–104.9) .016
Percentage IPH volume (%)b 7.9 (3.0–17.0) 5.4 (2.5–10.1) .074
IPH length (mm) 12.0 (4.5–17.5) 10.0 (4.0–14.0) .101

Note:—FCR indicates fibrous cap rupture.

a

P values are based on the Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher exact test between patients with and without ipsilateral ACI lesions.

b

Only patients with the corresponding component present were included in the comparison.