Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Mar 12;88(6):570–581. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000496

Table 5.

Univariate binomial GLMM models predicting time lagged suicide attempts

SA Predicted by Relationship Satisfaction SA Predicted by Emotion Dysregulation

b OR 95% CI (OR) p-value b OR 95% CI (OR) p-value
Intercept −2.32 0.10 0.04 – 0.18 <.001* −2.43 0.09 0.04 – 0.17 <.001*
Between Effects
Linear growth −1.60 0.20 0.14 – 0.28 <.001* −1.54 0.21 0.14 – 0.30 <.001*
Quadratic growth 0.49 1.63 1.39 – 1.92 <.001* 0.53 1.70 1.43 – 2.04 <.001*
Between person predictor −0.74 0.47 0.17 – 1.21 .13 0.03 1.03 0.99 – 1.06 .10
Predictor * linear growth −0.01 0.99 0.64 – 1.49 .96 0.01 1.01 0.99 – 1.02 .40
Predictor * quadratic growth 0.12 1.13 0.90 – 1.43 .30 −0.01 0.99 0.99 – 1.01 .65
Within Effects
Within person predictor −0.41 0.66 0.40 – 1.05 .09 0.01 1.01 0.99 – 1.04 .27

SA Predicted by Problem-Focused Coping SA Predicted by Avoidant Coping

b OR 95% CI (OR) p-value b OR 95% CI (OR) p-value
Intercept −2.40 0.09 0.04 – 0.18 <.001* −2.57 0.08 0.03 – 0.15 <.001*
Between effects
Linear growth −1.56 0.21 0.14 – 0.29 <.001* −1.61 0.20 0.13 – 0.28 <.001*
Quadratic growth 0.52 1.68 1.42 – 2.03 <.001* 0.56 1.75 1.47 – 2.12 <.001*
Between person predictor −1.84 0.16 0.03 – 0.67 .01* 0.48 1.62 0.43 – 6.57 .48
Predictor * linear growth −0.50 0.60 0.31 – 1.17 .14 −0.05 0.95 0.51 – 1.78 .86
Predictor * quadratic growth 0.23 1.26 0.88 – 1.82 .20 0.04 1.04 0.74 – 1.44 .83
Within effects
Within person predictor −0.32 0.73 0.24 – 2.19 .56 0.66 1.94 0.69 – 5.71 .22

Note. SA = suicide attempt