Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;10:8063. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64912-6

Table 1.

Assessment of image subsets via feature selection. Image subsets were selected by an exhaustive search using the Dice similarity coefficient (mean ± SD across all mice) between labels generated using the subset and the optimized protocol (i.e., T1 and T2 maps and all 22 saturation transfer-weighted images with B1 = 3 and 6 µT) as the metric. The positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV, respectively) of tumour and necrosis/apoptosis labels are also given with respect to those generated from all images from the optimized protocol.

No. of Images T1 T2 3 µT 6 µT Dice
similarity coefficient
(%)
Active tumour Necrosis/apoptosis
3 ppm 5 ppm 30 ppm 48 ppm 5 ppm 8 ppm 48 ppm 75 ppm PPV
(%)
NPV
(%)
PPV
(%)
NPV
(%)
3 X X X 93 ± 3 94 ± 4 96 ± 3 60 ± 30 99 ± 2
4 X X X X 94 ±3 94 ± 5 97 ± 3 70 ± 30 98 ± 2
5 X X X X X 95 ± 2 97 ± 3 96 ± 3 70 ± 30 99 ± 1
6 X X X X X X 95 ± 2 97 ± 3 97 ± 3 70 ± 30 99 ± 1
7 X X X X X X X 95 ± 2 95 ± 4 99 ± 1 70 ± 30 99 ± 2
8 X X X X X X X X 97 ± 2 97 ± 3 99 ± 1 90 ± 10 99 ± 1
9 X X X X X X X X X 98 ± 1 98 ± 1 99 ± 1 95 ± 4 100 ± 1